Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Production and Disemployment.
asked the Minister for Industry and Commerce if he will state the causes for the steep fall in the volume of production of manufacturing industries in (a) the June quarter of this year, when the index number stood at 101.5 compared with 107.1 for the June quarter, 1955, and (b) the September quarter of this year, when the index number stood at 98.2 compared with 107.7 for the September quarter of 1955.
Comment on this
asked the Minister for Industry and Commerce if he can state in regard to the fall in employment of 6,281 in industries producing transportable goods in the 12 month period ended last September (a) the causes for this steep fall in employment, (b) the extent to which disemployment in these industries was offset, if at all, by new industries set up during the period, and (c) the extent to which the disemployment took place in well-established industries.
Comment on this
With the permission of the Ceann Comhairle, I propose to take Question No. 12 and Question No. 13 together; and to circulate in the official report a statement, prepared by the Central Statistics Office, showing the estimated changes in employment in the various industries producing transportable goods in September, 1956, as compared with September, 1955.
I am not in a position, without a special investigation, to say to what extent disemployment has been offset by new industries established during the period in question. As regards the causes for the decline in employment and production, I would refer the Deputy to the answers given by me and by the Minister for Finance to similar questions by him on the 29th November, 1956.
Following is the statement:—
ESTIMATED NUMBER OF PERSONS ENGAGED* IN TRANSPORTABLE GOODS INDUSTRIES IN SEPTEMBER, 1955 AND 1956, SHOWING INCREASES AND DECREASES.
*Including proprietors and salaried employees, but excluding outside pieceworkers.
Comment on this
Does the Minister agree that the very steep fall in the volume of production of our manufactured industries is extremely alarming and will he not make a fresh assessment of the causes for this fall? I think that at the time that he and the Minister for Finance gave the reply the latest figures were not then available, at least not to the House. Whether they were available to the Minister or not, I do not know.
Comment on this
If the Deputy waits to look at the statistical information which I am making available to him, he will see the areas in which there have been increases in unemployment. Some of these increases are probably due to seasonal causes. Others are due to causes which, probably, the Deputy will be able to assess to some considerable extent himself.
Comment on this
Does the Minister not consider it essential that he and the Government should have a clear assessment themselves and should be in a position to assess the causes of this most alarming fall in both production and employment and, further, can the Minister state whether he considers it possible to secure an expansion of production and industrial employment while a restricted credit policy is being pursued?
Comment on this
The credit policy, as I have indicated to the Deputy on a previous occasion, is a matter for the Minister for Finance. The Deputy will see, when he looks at this table, that there is an assessment of the extent of the unemployment in certain industries but not all of those are industries which concern Industry and Commerce alone. A number of these industries concern agriculture but are nevertheless brought under the heading of transportable goods because what is produced, although it may be an agricultural commodity, is transportable goods for the purpose of our record.
Comment on this
What can the Government do to remedy the situation?