We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil

Committee on Finance. - Private Members' Business: Motions Not Moved.

Cormac Breslin An Leas-Cheann Comhairle Fianna Fáil

Motion No. 20, in the name of Deputy McQuillan.

Comment on this

I do not propose to move that motion.

Comment on this
Cormac Breslin An Leas-Cheann Comhairle Fianna Fáil

Motion No. 21 in the names of Deputies Browne and McQuillan.

Comment on this

I do not propose to move that motion.

Comment on this

The Deputy has said he is not moving it but Deputy Browne is not here. Is it not usual to give a Deputy a moment or two. I say that even though I might not have any sympathy with the particular motion.

Comment on this
Cormac Breslin An Leas-Cheann Comhairle Fianna Fáil

Motion No. 21 in the names of Deputies Browne and McQuillan. Does Deputy Browne propose to go on with the motion?

Comment on this

I am not moving it, Sir.

Comment on this
Cormac Breslin An Leas-Cheann Comhairle Fianna Fáil

Motion No. 22 in the names of Deputies McQuillan and Browne.

Comment on this

It is not being moved.

Comment on this
Cormac Breslin An Leas-Cheann Comhairle Fianna Fáil

Motion No. 23 in the names of Deputies Browne and McQuillan.

Comment on this

It is not being moved.

Comment on this
Cormac Breslin An Leas-Cheann Comhairle Fianna Fáil

Motion No. 24 in the name of Deputy George Russell.

Comment on this

Do we not give a Deputy a few moments? Is it not usual to give him a few moments in a case like that?

Comment on this

I understand that Deputy Russell is not moving it.

Comment on this
Cormac Breslin An Leas-Cheann Comhairle Fianna Fáil

I take it that if the Deputy were interested he would be in his seat.

Comment on this

He might not anticipate the other motions being dropped.

Comment on this

He might not have anticipated that Private Members' time would come on so quickly.

Comment on this
Cormac Breslin An Leas-Cheann Comhairle Fianna Fáil

That would be a matter for the Deputy.

Comment on this
Cormac Breslin An Leas-Cheann Comhairle Fianna Fáil

Motion No. 25 in the name of Deputy John Murphy.

Comment on this
John Murphy Mr. J. Murphy Independent

I am not moving that motion.

Comment on this

Sara rachaidh tú ar aghaidh go dtí an chéad rún eile. I should like to point out to members of the Dáil generally that this is the first official intimation the Government has had that these motions were not being moved. I am responsible for seeing to the best of my ability that business runs smoothly in this House. I had arrangements made for the various Ministers and Parliamentary Secretaries dealing with motions Nos. 20 to 26 to be prepared to deal with them as they came around, either to-night or later on. I think it is only fair to expect that Deputies who table motions should, in courtesy to the Government — I understand there is no rule about it—tell the Minister concerned or tell me that they do not propose to go ahead.

Comment on this

In reply to the Parliamentary Secretary, I want to make it quite clear that the Government received seven days' notice of the fact that motion No. 26 on to-day's Order Paper would be moved immediately after the motion dealing with the United Nations. The intention, when the Dáil reopened on the 23rd October was that motion No. 26 would be moved. Due to a misunderstanding which occurred on that occasion — which, I want to have it on the records of the House, was not due to the staff of the House in any way — that motion had to be postponed and, instead, the second motion on the Order Paper, dealing with a plebiscite on the matter of United Nations observers, was taken. I made it clear last week that, if I received the consent of the other Deputies who had motions on the Order Paper to postpone their motions, it was my intention, immediately after the motion dealing with the United Nations, to move the motion dealing with internee arrangements.

Earlier to-day the Government had sufficient notice of the fact that this motion was coming up to-night because the Government, through some of their representatives, made the necessary inquiries through the Ceann Comhairle's office as to whether it was my intention to move motion No. 26 on the Order Paper and the Government was so informed. There is no doubt whatever that the Government knew that this motion was coming up. It even went so far that the Government suggested that the motion be postponed on the basis that the Minister who was to take the motion was ill.

Comment on this

The Government did not.

Comment on this

That is the position.

Comment on this

The Government did not.

Comment on this

Such was the information conveyed to me.

Comment on this

That information was wrong.

Comment on this

That the Minister was ill and, therefore, it would be ungentlemanly, in other words, that this motion should go ahead while the Minister was ill. I want that on the records of the House.

Comment on this

Is Deputy McQuillan finished, because I should like to say something in reply?

Comment on this
Cormac Breslin An Leas-Cheann Comhairle Fianna Fáil

I should point out to the House that we cannot have any debate on this point. The Parliamentary Secretary is entitled to put his point to the House and I have allowed Deputy McQuillan to reply but there cannot be any debate because there is no motion before the house.

Comment on this

The other point I want to make is that no information came from any Deputy direct to the Government that that would be the position as regards motion No. 26. We did hear rumours, but neither Deputy Russell nor Deputy Murphy, who were responsible for two motions, told us that they were not moving their motions to-night. Neither did Deputy McQuillan.

Comment on this

The Parliamentary Secretary is not so naive as to suggest that it was necessary for any Deputy to tell the Parliamentary Secretary that he would not move a motion. The Government were well aware of the fact that I would be moving motion No. 26 to-night and were aware of that fact since last week.

Comment on this

We were not. I do not say it is necessary at all, but it would make for the more expeditious transaction of business if we knew exactly where we stood beforehand, not at 12 o'clock to-day.

Comment on this

I cannot help that.

Comment on this