We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil

Planning Appeals Bill, 1967: First Stage.

Bill Planning Appeals Bill, 1967
Defeated

No. 19 of 1967 ›

We are not opposing the First Stage. According to the Standing Orders, the Second Stage will be taken on the first occasion there is Private Members' Business.

Comment on this

If it is not opposed, it can be taken now.

Comment on this
Patrick Hogan An Ceann Comhairle Labour Party

Not Second Stage.

Comment on this

I beg pardon; I thought you said First Stage.

Comment on this

In the unlikely event of business being finished before Question Time, I assume that questions will be taken as soon as the business is finished?

Comment on this
Patrick Hogan An Ceann Comhairle Labour Party

The Chair would be very agreeable to that.

Agreed.

Comment on this
Patrick Hogan An Ceann Comhairle Labour Party

Housing (Gaeltacht) (Amendment) Bill, 1967.

Comment on this

You will not take any business; Fine Gael cannot take business. We were ready with the Road Traffic Bill and you would not take it.

Comment on this

In view of the entirely irresponsible statement of the Minister for Local Government, may I say that the Government intended to take this morning, firstly, business they had not even said last week they were going to take this week and, secondly, they are so bad that they could not produce——

Comment on this

If you know what you are at, why can you not order your business properly?

Comment on this

An hour here and an hour there.

Comment on this

The Business of this House apparently had to be arranged to meet the convenience of the lawyer Members of the front bench of Fine Gael who are otherwise engaged in the morning.

Comment on this

That is untrue and it is as scurrilous as Deputy Carty was in Clarenbridge the other day. You do not understand the meaning of the word "honour".

Comment on this

In view of the disorder, Sir, would you not consider naming the Minister for Local Government?

Comment on this

Then, how could I deal with your question on the Adjournment?

Comment on this