We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil
‹ Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - County Galway River Drainage.

River Nanny drainage at Tuam

Summary

Drainage was postponed in 1964 to protect Tuam’s waterworks and can be reconsidered after the new water supply scheme. The Minister assured that funding would be available if Galway County Council completes its part, advising the Deputy to contact the council.

asked the Minister for Finance when the Office of Public Works will complete the drainage of the River Nanny at Tuam, County Galway.

Comment on this

The Nanny River was scheduled for treatment under the drainage scheme for the Corrib/Clare catchment area. This work had to be postponed because the existing Tuam waterworks would be damaged by silt. Galway County Council are preparing a new water supply scheme for Tuam and when this has been carried out drainage of the Nanny can be considered again.

Comment on this

When did work stop on this drainage scheme in view of the fact that Galway County Council wanted the water supply for the town of Tuam?

Comment on this

1964.

Comment on this

I take it that Galway County Council have been from 1964 to 1976 preparing a water scheme for Tuam?

Comment on this

That is so.

Comment on this

Is the Parliamentary Secretary aware that approximately 67 farmers and 1,200 acres are involved in the completion of this drainage scheme and it appears the scheme is held up due to the inefficiency of Galway County Council. If Galway County Council did their part, would the Board of Works be prepared to spend the money to complete the drainage?

Comment on this

Yes, I can give that assurance but I advise the Deputy to take up the matter with Galway County Council.

Comment on this
Garrett Fitzgerald Mr. G. Fitzgerald Fine Gael

Is the Deputy a member of Galway County Council?

Comment on this
Seán Treacy An Ceann Comhairle Labour Party

Question No. 13.

Comment on this