Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Widow's Pension.
- Widow’s Pension and Benefits 8 speeches
MacSharry sought to raise the widow’s pension to the old-age pension level and provide equivalent benefits. Cluskey said improvements would be considered in the budget and declined to predict its outcome.
Raymond MacSharry, Frank Cluskey
- Real Value of Social Welfare Payments 15 speeches
Colley challenged the claim that welfare had improved, arguing payments were lower in real terms, while Cluskey cited a 75% rise in living costs against a minimum 105% increase in payments. They disputed arranging a detailed debate, and Colley gave notice of an Adjournment matter; Faulkner also questioned whether beneficiaries faced higher-than-average cost increases, which Cluskey partly acknowledged but disputed as “much higher.”
George Colley, Frank Cluskey, Seán Treacy, Padraig Faulkner, Brendan Crinion
asked the Minister for Social Welfare if he will increase the widow's pension to the level of the old age pension, with all the other benefits such as free light and fuel; and if he will make a statement on the matter.
Comment on this
Any proposals for increases in social welfare payments or for other improvements in the schemes administered by my Department are matters for consideration in connection with the budget.
Comment on this
Would the Parliamentary Secretary agree that widows should have the same facilities and fringe benefits as old age non-contributory pensioners?
Comment on this
As the Deputy is aware, on many occasions I have expressed my desire for considerable improvements in many areas of social welfare. During the past three-and-a-half years that view has been put into practice in many areas.
Comment on this
The Deputy would be very foolish to take that from my reply. My reply was that any improvement in the social welfare code would be a matter for the budget. The Deputy will appreciate that I could not anticipate the budget.
Comment on this
The Parliamentary Secretary must have some knowledge in regard to his recommendations for social welfare increases in the forthcoming budget?
Comment on this
I have expressed my views publicly on many occasions. What I recommend or do not recommend is of little interest to widows. The final outcome would be of interest to them. What I am suggesting is that it would not be possible for me at this stage to anticipate a forthcoming budget.
Comment on this
After the Parliamentary Secretary's reference to the past three-and-a-half years, is the Parliamentary Secretary aware that present payments of social welfare under practically every head are in real terms lower than they were when the Parliamentary Secretary came into office? If the Parliamentary Secretary is not aware, why is he not aware, because it is his job to know that?
Comment on this
I am not aware of it and the reason that I am not aware of it is that it is not a factual statement and I do not confuse my mind as the Deputy would appear to do by entertaining inaccurate statements.
Comment on this
Would the Parliamentary Secretary care to be supplied with the figures to prove it from his own side?
Comment on this
Not only do we not want to be supplied with figures but I am prepared now to give the Deputy the factual situation with regard to social welfare. In 1973 when this Government took over from Fianna Fáil the condition of social welfare recipients was to say the least pitiful. The increase in the cost of living which was disclosed in this House by a parliamentary question to the Taoiseach showed an increase of 75 per cent over the three-and-a-half years and the lowest increase in social welfare payments during that period was 105 per cent. I am aware that not alone is the Deputy confused about what I have stated but other commentators also appear not to have done very simple arithmetic to establish the factual situation.
Comment on this
In view of the Parliamentary Secretary's obvious lack of knowledge of the basic concern he should have in his job, would the Parliamentary Secretary be prepared to arrange a procedure through the Whips whereby this matter can be gone into in detail in this House and we can take every item of social welfare, take its value when the Parliamentary Secretary came into office and calculate its real value now on the basis of figures given in reply to a parliamentary question and see how it compares with the situation when Fianna Fáil were in office?
Comment on this
I would be more than happy to discuss this matter publicly with the Deputy in any venue that he cares to arrange.
Comment on this
Would the Parliamentary Secretary accept this venue —the place where the Parliamentary Secretary is responsible?
Comment on this
Yes, but I do not accept it as my responsibility to do the Deputy's work as a Member of the Opposition. If the Deputy wants time in the House, it is for him through his Whip to take the initiative. From my experience over the last three-and-a-half years I know that Fianna Fáil have very little knowledge not only of how to be a Government but of how to be a responsible Opposition. I do not intend to take on the burden of what the Deputy is apparently not able to cope with.
Comment on this
In view of the Parliamentary Secretary's understandable reluctance to oblige me with the request I made, may I give notice that I desire to raise this subject matter on the Adjournment?
Comment on this
Would the Parliamentary Secretary agree that the cost of living increases in the cases of social welfare beneficiaries are much higher than the average cost of living increases?
Comment on this
No, I would not agree that they are much higher. I accept that the cost of living index does not fully reflect the average purchasing of a social welfare recipient and I accept that there would be some margin in respect of that but the fact remains that the cost of living index has gone up by 75 per cent and the lowest social welfare recipient by 105 per cent. They are indisputable facts.