We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil
‹ Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Children's Allowance Books.

Possible review of children’s allowances

Summary

Andrews asks whether the Finance Minister’s comments about reviewing children’s allowances signal a change to the scheme. Cluskey says the book change is unrelated and declines to comment on budget matters; the exchange ends with a brief joke about abolishing the Minister for Finance.

I hope the purpose of the change is not contained in the recent statement of the Minister for Finance when he suggested a review of children's allowances could——

Comment on this
Seán Treacy An Ceann Comhairle Labour Party

This is another matter and there is a question on the Order Paper in connection with it.

Comment on this

I do not want to upset the Parliamentary Secretary.

Comment on this

I can assure the Deputy that there is absolutely no relationship between the two matters.

Comment on this

Can we take it from the answer to the question that the present system of children's allowances will not be interfered with by any voluntary action taken by the Minister for Finance, Deputy Ryan, the Parliamentary Secretary's colleague in Coalition?

Comment on this

Surely the Deputy must appreciate that it would not be proper for me to comment on budgetary matters. I can assure the Deputy that when he is considering what he regards as Deputy Ryan's statement——

Comment on this
Seán Treacy An Ceann Comhairle Labour Party

The Minister for Finance.

Comment on this

The Minister for Finance issued some thoughts.

Comment on this

Bad ones as far as the Tánaiste is concerned.

Comment on this

It is obvious that Deputies opposite find the question of thinking so amusing.

Comment on this

On that basis, can we look forward to the abolition of the Minister for Finance?

Comment on this
Seán Treacy An Ceann Comhairle Labour Party

Order. Question No. 17.

Comment on this

Not with much optimism I am afraid.

Comment on this