Agricultural officers’ pay during dispute
McEllistrim and Hussey urged payment for agricultural officers who did office work while not using their cars during a dispute. Clinton refused, saying the officers’ absence was unauthorized and legal advice barred payment; he corrected the figures to about 270 officers, most absent for 13 days.
asked the Minister for Agriculture if he will consider having payment made to agricultural officers for the eight days in which they did not use their cars but did work in the office, in view of the fact that there are 400 workers involved.
Comment on this
The answer to the Deputy's question is "No".
I am advised that I am debarred by law from paying remuneration to the officers concerned in respect of their unauthorised absence from duty and failure to carry out the duties assigned to them.
I should add that the number of agricultural officers involved was about 270 and that the majority were on unauthorised absence from duty for a period of 13 days.
Comment on this
This is very unfair of the Minister because those 200 men worked for a week. They did not use their cars because there was a dispute between their union and the Department. I think they should be paid their week's salary.
Comment on this
It was an unofficial dispute. They themselves decided to absent themselves and I am advised that I cannot pay them, whatever I might think about it.
Comment on this
Surely it is not illegal for the Minister to pay those men for work which they did during that week? They did their office work; they did not use their cars.