Hunger strikes and close confinement
The Minister said refusing food is a breach of prison discipline that may cost privileges but does not necessarily lead to close confinement; hunger strikers confined to bed are alone in their cells. Brugha warned that isolation could worsen their mental distress, while the Minister defended the practice when prisoners were weak.
Can the Minister tell the House whether involvement or participation in a hunger strike constitutes grounds for solitary confinement or for being kept alone?
Comment on this
Participation in a hunger strike—in other words, the refusal of food—is a breach of good order and discipline in prisons and gives rise to loss of privileges but not necessarily to close confinement.
Comment on this
In the present instance has this occurred?
Comment on this
It would occur to the extent that people who are on hunger strike are confined to bed. In that sense they would be alone in their cells.
Comment on this
Without taking into consideration the merits or otherwise of the reasons for such actions, would the Minister appreciate that the stress of mind which results from a hunger strike can be aggravated considerably by reason of a person being alone?