We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil
‹ Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - House Grant Scheme.

Eligibility for replacement-house grants

Summary

O’Toole raises hardship for people whose homes need replacement rather than repair. Barrett says old farmhouses can qualify for the new-house grant, including where a proper dwelling is necessary, and offers to clarify the scheme in publications; the Chair rules out discussing individual cases.

Does the Minister intend to introduce any other grant in respect of new houses and, if not, is he aware of the hardship caused to people whose houses are gone beyond reconstruction stage? They are not viable any more for reconstruction down in the country in some cases. Those people who up to now would be in receipt of a grant of £950 find themselves in receipt of nil.

Comment on this

Is the Deputy referring to reconstruction grants?

Comment on this

I am referring to houses which are gone beyond reconstruction stage where the only viable job is a replacement job. They get nothing.

Comment on this

In the case of a farmer with a family who owns his house which is a very old house and is now in disrepair, he cannot get a £1,000 grant because he owns the house.

Comment on this

That is not so. That man qualifies for the £1,000. An old farmhouse qualifies and this has been made clear already.

Comment on this

By whom?

Comment on this

It does not have to be uninhabitable. An old farmhouse which has been in the family for several generations qualifies for a new house grant.

Comment on this

Let me clarify this. Take the case of a man residing in a very dilapidated house, replacement of which is the only solution to his problem. If he owns the house and can produce the deeds to it, is he entitled to £1,000?

Comment on this

Yes. On the land.

Comment on this
Thomas J. Fitzpatrick Mr. T. J. Fitzpatrick Fine Gael

(Cavan-Monaghan): I should like to be clear on this point. Am I right in thinking if the farmer in question bought or built the house in question, no matter how long ago, then he is not entitled to £1,000, but he is if he inherited it?

Comment on this

If he built the house it is probable that he has already availed of grants.

Comment on this
Joseph Brennan An Ceann Comhairle Fianna Fáil

I have been allowing more than enough supplementary questions all of which are separate questions.

Comment on this

The Deputy is speaking about houses which are beyond repair.

Comment on this
Joseph Brennan An Ceann Comhairle Fianna Fáil

Question No. 18.

Comment on this
Thomas J. Fitzpatrick Mr. T. J. Fitzpatrick Fine Gael

(Cavan-Monaghan): I am making a genuine effort to clear up this point. If the farmer bought or built the house 40 years ago, and it is now falling around his ears, he is not entitled to £1,000.

Comment on this

He would be if it is a necessity of life for that man to have a proper dwelling. If the house is as bad as the Deputy said, that man is entitled to £1,000.

Comment on this

He is not a first-time purchaser.

Comment on this
Thomas J. Fitzpatrick Mr. T. J. Fitzpatrick Fine Gael

(Cavan-Monaghan): Let the Minister tell me where that is in the scheme because I cannot see it.

Comment on this

If there is some mis-understanding about that I will have it made clear by way of publications.

Comment on this

Is the Minister aware that in the past week a man was refused a grant?

Comment on this
Joseph Brennan An Ceann Comhairle Fianna Fáil

We cannot take individual cases. Question Time is for a different purpose.

Comment on this

If the Deputy has a specific case, he should bring it to my attention.

Comment on this

Does the Minister's reply to Deputy O'Toole refer to urban dwellers as well as to rural dwellers who have uninhabitable houses and who purchased them many years ago?

Comment on this

An uninhabitable house is usually condemned in an urban area.

Comment on this
Joseph Brennan An Ceann Comhairle Fianna Fáil

I have called Question No. 18.

18.

Comment on this