Eligibility for replacement-house grants
O’Toole raises hardship for people whose homes need replacement rather than repair. Barrett says old farmhouses can qualify for the new-house grant, including where a proper dwelling is necessary, and offers to clarify the scheme in publications; the Chair rules out discussing individual cases.
Does the Minister intend to introduce any other grant in respect of new houses and, if not, is he aware of the hardship caused to people whose houses are gone beyond reconstruction stage? They are not viable any more for reconstruction down in the country in some cases. Those people who up to now would be in receipt of a grant of £950 find themselves in receipt of nil.
Comment on this
I am referring to houses which are gone beyond reconstruction stage where the only viable job is a replacement job. They get nothing.
Comment on this
In the case of a farmer with a family who owns his house which is a very old house and is now in disrepair, he cannot get a £1,000 grant because he owns the house.
Comment on this
That is not so. That man qualifies for the £1,000. An old farmhouse qualifies and this has been made clear already.
Comment on this
It does not have to be uninhabitable. An old farmhouse which has been in the family for several generations qualifies for a new house grant.
Comment on this
Let me clarify this. Take the case of a man residing in a very dilapidated house, replacement of which is the only solution to his problem. If he owns the house and can produce the deeds to it, is he entitled to £1,000?
Comment on this
(Cavan-Monaghan): I should like to be clear on this point. Am I right in thinking if the farmer in question bought or built the house in question, no matter how long ago, then he is not entitled to £1,000, but he is if he inherited it?
Comment on this
I have been allowing more than enough supplementary questions all of which are separate questions.
Comment on this
(Cavan-Monaghan): I am making a genuine effort to clear up this point. If the farmer bought or built the house 40 years ago, and it is now falling around his ears, he is not entitled to £1,000.
Comment on this
He would be if it is a necessity of life for that man to have a proper dwelling. If the house is as bad as the Deputy said, that man is entitled to £1,000.
Comment on this
(Cavan-Monaghan): Let the Minister tell me where that is in the scheme because I cannot see it.
Comment on this
If there is some mis-understanding about that I will have it made clear by way of publications.
Comment on this
Does the Minister's reply to Deputy O'Toole refer to urban dwellers as well as to rural dwellers who have uninhabitable houses and who purchased them many years ago?