May I take it from the Parliamentary Secretary's reply that he is not happy with the administration of the track in Dublin?

That does not arise on this question. Personally I should have preferred if the track in question were located somewhere on the perimeter of the city where it would have been available to thousands of young people who would have used it.

Is the Parliamentary Secretary saying that the track is not being fully utilised? If that is the case, what steps is he taking to see that it will be fully utilised?

We are getting away from the original question.

No, it is based on the Parliamentary Secretary's assertion.

It is acting as a reminder. That is about the only relation to the question.

The Parliamentary Secretary's reply was based on the assertion that the track in Dublin was not being used to his satisfaction. I want to know why this is so and what steps he is taking to ensure that the track is used to his satisfaction.

The Deputy's interpretation of what I said is not correct. I am sure I do not have to tell the Deputy that the tartan track in Dublin is not located in Cork, the area to which the question refers.

I am calling Question No. 16.

With respect, I did not introduce the tartan track in Dublin. The Parliamentary Secretary has based his unwillingness to consider the proposal for Cork on the same financial basis as the track in Dublin on the fact that the track in Dublin is not being used satisfactorily. I am asking him if he has taken any measures to ensure that the tartan track is more satisfactorily used.

That is a totally separate matter. I am calling Question No. 16.