Allegations in former staff member’s memorandum
The Minister declined to comment on a private individual’s memorandum, saying the college board—not he—was responsible for its affairs. Collins argued the allegations of malpractice and concerns about senior appointments warranted ministerial attention; the Chair ended the questioning.
asked the Minister for Education if he will make a statement on a memorandum sent to him by a former member (name supplied) of the NCAD who resigned from the college staff.
Comment on this
It would not be in accordance with established procedure for me to furnish observations in the particular circumstances on a memorandum received by me from an individual acting in his private capacity.
Comment on this
In view of the memorandum he has received, would the Minister agree that the allegations made are of a serious nature and that there is evidence of some malpractice within the college? Is the Minister aware in relation to appointments within the college that great concern has been expressed regarding certain appointments at a very high level?
Comment on this
I should like to point out that the responsibilities of the board are defined by law under the 1971 Act and that this submission is from an individual in reference to the activities of the board. The board must deal with individuals and staff and the Minister does not come in there.
Comment on this
Are we not agreed that, when malpractices are brought to his attention, the Minister has responsibility in relation to the board and in relation to good education generally and the students who are attending the college? Is the Minister not further aware——
Comment on this
The Deputy will resume his seat. I want to point out to the Deputy that he will not ask questions in defiance of the Chair.