asked the Minister for Education his reasons for seeking consultations with interested parties involved in community schools; the changes he will be seeking in the deeds of trust for (a) existing community schools and (b) future community schools; and if he will make a comprehensive statement of policy in this matter.

I was given to understand that there were certain provisions in the model deed of trust which some of the educational interests involved considered should be raised before the deed in the case of any individual school should be signed. I, accordingly, arranged to meet all the educational interests involved for a discussion of the relevant provisions of the deed.

Pending conclusion of the discussions which have been initiated I do not consider that it would be appropriate for me to make a statement in relation to the issues which may form the subject of such discussions.

Why did the Minister state categorically that he was about to sign a number of deeds of trust?

I am going to sign deeds of trust.

Yes, but in their original form.

That is the Deputy's——

The Minister said he was carrying out the undertakings of his predecessors.

Which predecessor? Three or four cogs have intervened.

Predecessors. Practically within 24 hours the Minister has changed his tactics and has decided to go off on a round of negotiations and consultations.

I am calling the next question.

A Houdini act.

Just one brief supplementary. Is the Minister aware of the allegation which has been published to the effect that he stated he would sign a document—that he would alter a document he later admitted not having read? Would the Minister comment on this very serious allegation?

It depends on the source of the allegation. I am accustomed to attacks from the media and I am not a bit worried about them.

Questions Nos. 31 and 32 are for written reply.