Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers . - Primary and Post-Primary Education .
- Maximum class size of 40 16 speeches
The Minister said a 40-pupil maximum would follow further improvements in the pupil-teacher ratio, but gave no timetable or assurance it would be achieved during the Government’s term. He affirmed the policy commitment, citing staffing and deployment as priorities; exchanges also included interruptions and the Chair’s call to keep questions concise.
John Horgan, John P. Wilson, Michael Keating, Joseph Brennan, Edward Collins
- Support for schools in deprived areas 8 speeches
The Minister described general rules for staffing and facilities, alongside a Rutland Street-style project in seven schools with additional teachers. He said support had included remedial teachers and flexibility in some cases; a report on the experiment had been published, with another in preparation.
Edward Collins, John P. Wilson, Michael Keating
- Regionalisation of education administration 9 speeches
Asked whether he supported regional administration of primary and post-primary education, the Minister cited unresolved complexities and said the previous Government’s initiative did not appeal to him at present. He declined to define that remark beyond saying the “vibes” were not correct.
Edward Collins, John P. Wilson, John Horgan, Joseph Brennan
asked the Minister for Education the arrangements he is making to ensure that maximum class size in national schools will be 40 pupils; and the date or dates by which such an upper limit will become operative in all national schools.
Comment on this
: Monitoring of the organisational arrangements in national schools is part of the normal functions of the Department's inspectorate.
The maximum class size of forty pupils will not be made mandatory in all national schools until the planned further improvements in the pupil/ teacher ratio are effected over the next few years.
Comment on this
: Would the Minister agree that, in the light of the manifesto commitment to reduce maximum class sizes to 40, it would be reasonable of us in this House and people outside to expect that that would become effective during the term of office of the present Government? Will he give that assurance now?
Comment on this
: The variables are always there. There is no explanation for explosion of population. I have been interrupted by Deputy Keating.
Comment on this
: I am sorry about the provocation. It is my firm resolution that what is asked be so, but I give no assurances and fix no dates.
Comment on this
: Is the Minister aware that there are over 170,000 children at present in classes of more than 40 and that at the present rate of improvement, the class size will not be reduced to the maximum of 40 during his term of office?
Comment on this
: I am aware of the figures quoted by the Deputy but I am aware also that there are more than 109,000 children in classes of fewer than 30 and that there are 3,741 children in classes of fewer than 15. I have an obligation to add to the teaching force and to try to deploy teachers so that the numbers in classes will be reduced to 40. That is my first obligation and I regard it as a sacred pact with the electorate.
Comment on this
: May we take it now that the undertaking in the manifesto to reduce class sizes to a maximum of 40 is being reneged on?
Comment on this
: There will be no reneging on that part of our policy as outlined in the manifesto nor will there be reneging on any other aspect of our policy either.
Comment on this
: What would the Minister do during the next general election campaign in the event of his failing to reduce class sizes to a maximum of 40?
Comment on this
: Questions that are loaded with argument are not conducive to speeding up the Question Time procedure.
5.
Comment on this
asked the Minister for Education if he will take steps to discriminate in favour of schools in designated deprived areas in the matter of (1) teacher/pupil ratio; (2) administrative and clerical staff; and (3) school facilities; and if he will make a statement on the matter.
Comment on this
: The regulations governing teacher/pupil ratios, support staff and school facilities are of general application.
The Rutland Street National School Project in Dublin was in effect a special experimental educational measure discriminating in favour of a deprived area. The curriculum developed for this project is being used in special infant classes in seven selected schools to which additional teachers have been allocated.
Comment on this
: Therefore, may we take it that the teacher-pupil ratio in terms of its general application will not be interfered with in relation to deprived areas? In other words, it is not now the intention to establish a policy of a more favourable teacher-pupil ratio in schools in deprived areas other than the extent to which this is permitted by existing regulations?
Comment on this
: I have told the Deputy already that in selected areas, and mainly for purposes of research and experimentation in order to ascertain what can be done in this regard, seven schools are now operating a Rutland Street-type project. However, the Deputy is slightly off beam in relation to the teacher-pupil ratio because many of the schools in those areas have very good teacher-pupil ratios. There are other problems to be dealt with as well as that of the teacher-pupil ratio.
Comment on this
: While accepting the Minister's concern in these matters, I would remind him that he is on the record of the House on a number of occasions since the election as being willing to discriminate in favour of some of these schools. Practically speaking, what has that expression of willingness meant to date?
Comment on this
: It has meant allotting remedial teachers in individual cases and being flexible with regard even to pupil-teacher ratios. The Deputy knows the truth of that in some instances.
Comment on this
: When will the experiment be finished and will the results be published or made known to the House?
Comment on this
: The results of the major experiment were published some time ago and a second report is being prepared.
6.
Comment on this
asked the Minister for Education if he is in favour of the regionalisation of the administration of primary and post-primary education; and if he will make a statement on the matter.
Comment on this
: There are many complex aspects of this matter including due consideration of the views of the educational interests involved and the practical problems which would have to be solved.
I do not desire to make a statement in relation to it at present.
Comment on this
: Is the Minister aware that the previous Government took an initiative in this regard and is it his intention to put that initiative totally on the shelf?
Comment on this
: The Minister is so aware, but as is the case in respect of many of their initiatives it does not grab me at the moment.