Construction industry unemployment figures
The latest available live-register figures showed 24,040 people registered unemployed in building and construction on 16 March 1978, compared with 23,993 on 15 July 1977. Kelly and other Deputies challenged claims of thousands of new jobs, arguing employment had worsened; Lalor said the relevant year-on-year comparison showed 1,500 fewer registered unemployed and that the live register was not a true measure of available workers. The exchange ended without agreement, and the Ceann Comhairle moved to the next question.
asked the Taoiseach the most recent available figures for unemployment in the building and construction industry, with the corresponding figure for mid-July 1977.
Comment on this
: The latest date for which the industrial analysis of the live register is available is 16 March 1978. The total number of persons in the building, contracting and works of construction industry who were on the live register on 16 March 1978 was 24,040 while the corresponding figure on 15 July 1977 was 23,993.
Comment on this
: Would the Minister agree that those figures disclose that eight months after the Government assumed office there were still more people unemployed than when they arrived in office?
Comment on this
: No, I would not. The Deputy continues to refuse to look at life and to compare like with like. The figures establish that on 16 March of this year there were 1,500 fewer registered unemployed in the building and construction industry than on 18 March of last year.
Comment on this
: Does the Minister not accept that the reason why this question is repeatedly put down is that claims are being made not in regard to year-upon-year improvement but in regard to the creation of 3,500 jobs in the building industry? So, far from improvement being the case, there were more people at work in that industry in the middle of July 1977, than in the middle of March 1978. Even if I am wrong in putting it like that the Minister will still agree that there is a queer difference between the 1,500 year-on-year improvement and the 3,500 we have been hearing about.
Comment on this
: The Deputy still insists on non-acceptance of the fact that the live register is not a true indication of the volume of people not working who are available for employment.
Comment on this
: Would the Minister not accept that if jobs are created in the building industry within a certain number of months in which a Government are in office in any period, it is going to show up on the live register? Why are these fairy jobs not showing up on the live register?
Comment on this
: Later in the year when the figures for jobs this year are available the Deputy can ask this question.
Comment on this
: Would the Minister consider that, in spite of the claims made some months ago by his party about all the extra jobs which could be found —Deputy Kelly referred to 3,500 whereas 5,000 was the figure most commonly used—those jobs have not materialised? Is it not a fact that, far from improving, employment in the building industry is going the other way?
Comment on this
: He said it was inaccurate and blamed it for the discrepancy between 1,500 and 3,500.
Comment on this
: If the Minister blames the live register for the discrepancy between 1,500 and 3,500 what format does he use for reaching 3,500 extra employed?
Comment on this
: I did not introduce the figure of 3,500. What I said was that the number of people on the live register on 16 March of this year at 24,040 was over 1,500 less than the number who were registered as unemployed in that industry on 18 March 1977. That is comparing like with like.