Smallholders and unemployment assistance eligibility
The Minister estimated that raising the notional-assessment multiplier to £110 per £1 rateable valuation could make about 7,500 smallholders ineligible, but said the Green Paper did not propose adopting it and many might qualify through factual assessment. Desmond questioned the implications for smallholders, particularly in the western counties; the Minister said the system applied there and defended the possibility of factual reassessment, followed by brief interjections.
asked the Minister for Social Welfare the number of smallholders who would become ineligible for unemployment assistance in the event of the multiplier being increased to 110 per £1 RV.
Comment on this
: While it is not possible to put an exact figure on the number of smallholders who would become ineligible for unemployment assistance in the event of the multiplier being increased to £110 per £1 rateable valuation it is estimated that the figure would be in or about 7,500. This figure would, of course, be reduced to the extent that applicants ineligible on the notional basis might be eligible on the basis of factual assessment.
Comment on this
: The Minister will accept, I am sure, that that particular option is clearly contained in the Green Paper and may I ask if he views with equanimity the prospect of 7,500 smallholders being deleted from unemployment benefit?
Comment on this
: I do not view anything in the social welfare area, either positive or negative, with equanimity, but I should point out that this process of taking people with small farms off benefits which we in Fianna Fáil introduced, the notional system, was started by the Coalition Government. All the Green Paper does is give the national average for multiplier purposes at £110. It does not in any way state that that is going to be adopted. It just sets out what multiplier the national average would give us. I would like to point out that even if we were to increase the multiplier in the notional system the factual assessment basis still remains, and when the Coalition Government increased the multiplier before, a number of people came back in to benefit because they opted for factual assessment.
Comment on this
: I would accept what the Minister says but nevertheless would the Minister not agree that the net effect of the option outlined in the Green Paper is that 7,500 smallholders on average nationally would be removed from the register for unemployment assistance?
Comment on this
: I would be fairly confident that, even if we were to adopt that multiplier—which I am not saying is going to be adopted; and I would not favour adopting it—I would not think that it would be legitimate to apply a national average to the 12 western counties because completely different circumstances prevail but even if we were to adopt the national multiplier in western country circumstances, there would be a very large number of that 7,500 people, I am convinced, who would come back in on benefit on a factual assessment basis.
Comment on this
: But the Minister would accept that there is no such criterion as western development counties in the option laid out in the Green Paper?
Comment on this
: I appreciate that the Minister may be distancing himself from the implication in the Green Paper relative to the 7,500 people he mentioned but there is no reference whatever——
Comment on this
: The Minister for Economic Planning and Development has demonstrated here time and again at Question Time and other times that he is quite capable of defending himself.