We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil
‹ Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Wood Quay (Dublin) Excavations.

Formal record of notification

Summary

Members questioned why Dublin Corporation was notified by telephone, whether this was normal practice, and whether written confirmation followed. Wyse said the Commissioners of Public Works had made the call, no writing followed, and the Corporation was satisfied; Keating disputed that claim.

Arising from the Minister of State's reply, am I to take it that the Government informed Dublin Corporation by telephone only?

Comment on this

The Commissioners of Public Works.

Comment on this

Is this to be the normal Government practice in such cases?

Comment on this

We considered that this was within our rights because we had long discussions. I fail to understand why we are talking about one day's notice when this matter has been going on since 1968.

Comment on this

I want to ascertain why this unusual method of informing a local authority was used in this case.

Comment on this

It was in order.

Comment on this

I want the Minister of State to tell me if the telephone conversation was subsequently followed by a written communication.

Comment on this

Does this mean that Dublin Corporation do not have any formal record other than the telephone conversation?

Comment on this

Dublin Corporation are satisfied with these communications.

Comment on this

That is not true.

Comment on this

I am asking if Dublin Corporation have any formal communication other than the telephone call? Is that the correct position at the moment?

Comment on this

Yes, and they are satisfied.

Comment on this