asked the Minister for Industry, Commerce and Energy if he has any plans to hasten the opening of a mine on that portion of the Navan ore-body controlled by Bula Limited.

I am anxious to see the Bula portion of the Navan orebody come into production as soon as possible and I will take all steps within my competence to secure this objective.

As the Deputy is aware, planning permission is an essential prerequisite to mining development. The question of the diversion of the River Blackwater is an integral part of an application for planning permission by Bula Limited. At the present time an expert is actively engaged in a study of the river diversion and his report is expected before the end of the year.

Is it a fact that the £10 million given to Roche under this crazy arrangement about Bula has been taken by Roche and nothing has been done?

The Deputy should not mention private individuals in the House. The Deputy may refer to companies but the practice of mentioning private individuals must be discouraged and must not be permitted.

If, in the light of the complications and difficulties, planning permission is not given in this instance, is it possible that no progress will be made with mining this orebody, in which case the £10 million which Roche got from the State will be a total loss?

Will the Deputy please refrain from mentioning individuals' names?

Is that correct?

I am calling Question No. 14.

Before the Minister goes on in his staccato jabber to Question No. 14, may I ask a non-contentious question arising from Question No. 13? Will the Minister tell us how many jobs——

I crave the protection of the Chair.

Question No. 14.

It is a very serious question.

It does not arise under Question No. 13. Will the Deputy please resume his seat?

It does. I want to know how many jobs are being delayed?

14.