We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil
‹ Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - County Donegal National School Needs.

Tamney schools on a shared site

Summary

The plan is for separate Catholic and Protestant schools on a shared site. Blaney argues the religious division is undesirable and urges reconsideration; the Minister says the arrangement, studied since 1972, is the agreed practical solution and should proceed.

asked the Minister for Education the proposals for the erection of a new national school at Tamney, County Donegal.

Comment on this

My Department have proposals for the erection of two new central schools on a common site, at Tamney, one for Catholic pupils and the other for Church of Ireland, Presbyterian and Methodist pupils.

Comment on this

Can I take it that this decision has been confirmed and that it is the intention to have two separate schools within the one site?

Comment on this

Yes. That is what my reply says.

Comment on this

Has there been any indication recently as to the undesirability of this procedure of creating this divide and bringing the divide within the confines of one site? This seems to be the height of nonsense, if not much worse than that. I would ask the Minister to have another look at the underlying effects of such an arrangement. Why not the same school on the same site?

Comment on this

The whole question of reorganising the school facilities has been going on since 1972. This is the best arrangement that can be made in the circumstances.

Comment on this

From my local knowledge on this matter, may I ask the Minister again to have a further look at all the implications involved in having two separate schools on the same site divided on a religious basis? Surely this is running away from everything we are all talking about these days?

Comment on this

I would like the arrangement the Deputy suggests but, if it has been under study since 1972 and the arrangement I have mentioned is the one agreed to, we must proceed with it.

Comment on this

Would the Minister take into account that the fact that it has been under study since 1972 is a clear indication of the difficulty of arriving at any conclusion? This conclusion is of doubtful use and could well be detrimental rather than helpful.

Comment on this

I accept that, if you were at it for a long time and found difficulty in reaching any conclusion, when you did reach a conclusion it would be advisable to adhere to it.

Comment on this

That does not mean it is right. I do not think it is.

Comment on this