We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil
‹ Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Circular Letter to Local Authorities.

Local authority rate increase limit

Summary

Keating argues the 10% ceiling on rate increases restricts local authorities’ flexibility. Barrett says councils retain spending priorities within the limit and that buoyant valuations and grants can produce larger increases in receipts.

asked the Minister for the Environment if he is satisfied that the contents of a circular letter of 8 December 1978 to local authorities do not restrict the traditional freedoms of local authorities and their ability to respond sensitively to local needs.

Comment on this
Sylvester Barrett Minister for the Environment (Mr. Barrett) Fianna Fáil

I regard the upper limit of 10 per cent in increases in rate poundages allowed for 1979 as providing a fair alignment between local authority programmes and national economic policies for the current year. Within the upper limit, local authorities are free to determine their overall level of expenditure and their priorities as between their different programmes. The formula allows local authorities the benefit of all new and increased valuations occurring in their areas and is thus adapted to variations in the pace of development from place to place.

Comment on this

Does the Minister accept that the imposition for the first time ever of an upper limit on expenditure in accordance with the circular referred to in the question which says: "The Minister has directed that 10 per cent shall be the maximum amount by which the aggregate rate in the £ to be determined by each rating authority in respect of the local financial year 1978-79..."

Comment on this
Joseph Brennan An Ceann Comhairle Fianna Fáil

The Deputy is not permitted to quote at Question Time.

Comment on this

"...shall exceed the previous year's estimate." The imposition of that ceiling means, in effect, that the local authorities cannot respond to issues of concern, particularly since the Minister did not say he would be willing to consider exceptional cases. Is it not a fact that the traditional flexibility these authorities had is no longer there?

Comment on this

It is not a fact, because the 10 per cent is to keep it in line with national budgetary policy. It is not confined solely to 10 per cent. Because of the buoyancy in local authority areas it can be much higher. I will give the Deputy the example of his own local authority Dublin Corporation. Because of buoyancy and State grants, the increase for Dublin Corporation on rates being collected will total 16.6 per cent. Might I point out that for Dublin County Council it will be 17.8 per cent? I should like to say also that this matter was fully debated in December. On that occasion the Deputy said that he would not be averse to a suggestion that expenditure by local authorities should in some general way find itself in harmony with national economic policy. He went on to say, "I do not believe that local authorities should have an open-ended honeymoon if they want to go on a spree".

Comment on this