Registration figures and enforcement
The Minister gives Dublin totals of 1,337 buildings, 6,949 dwellings and 1,075 landlords registered, but cannot say what share of the total these represent. Deputies criticize the lack of complete local-authority data and compare registrations with census figures; the Minister says information has been requested and denies that the figures prove widespread non-compliance.
Further replying to Deputy Browne, I have some information here which he requested. The number of buildings registered by Dublin Corporation concerning the bye-laws since they were confirmed on 31 October 1974 was 1,337; dwellings registered 6,949 and landlords registered 1,075.
Comment on this
Could the Minister give us any idea of these figures as percentages of the number of houses existing and landlords? What do these figures represent in percentages?
Comment on this
But these figures are meaningless without some appreciation of the numbers involved, both as to landlords and to flats in private dwellings.
Comment on this
The position is that all local authorities were requested by my Department in November last to furnish the necessary information. Some of them have and some of them have not. We have sent out reminders. We have been in touch with those who have not sent in the information and, when we receive all of the information, we shall correlate it and we shall then have valuable information and statistics available.
Comment on this
Is it not a fact that the total number and the percentages, as suggested by me, is one question which should be resubmitted to local authorities? Is the Minister asking the question of the total number and these figures as a percentage of the total number?
Comment on this
Therefore, the Minister has no idea of the real efficiency of this Act, whether it is working at all, whether it is 2 per cent, 20 per cent or whatever?
Comment on this
My question relates to the Minister's last reply. He indicated that in November of last year he requested this information from local authorities and he has not yet got it. Does the Minister consider such a response from local authorities adequate and, if not, what action is he taking to ensure that this essential information is got as quickly as possible by his Department, because it is a matter of concern to all sides of this House?
Comment on this
My Department were in touch with local authorities by telephone some time ago. We intend to take firm action against local authorities who do not submit the necessary information. I have not got in front of me details of the information which was requested from the local authorities.
Comment on this
What does "firm action" mean and when will this information requested by two Deputies be made available to the House? When will the Minister be in a position to know? What does "firm action" mean and when will the Minister actually know what is the situation?
Comment on this
As a new Deputy, if the Minister in reply to a question volunteers information and, instead of answering the first question answers another, surely we are entitled to ask supplementaries?
Comment on this
Might I ask the Minister is it not the case that the figures he gives for Dublin represent such a tiny fraction of the amount of private rented accommodation recorded in the 1971 Census—the amount of which has considerably increased since—as to demonstrate clearly a total and flagrant abuse of the law?
Comment on this
That is not true. The figures which I gave are actual figures and are not related to percentages.
Comment on this
Deputy FitzGerald, we are now getting into argument and this can go on for ever so long——
Comment on this
The Minister of State has misunderstood my question. The 1971 Census in regard to housing reports the amount of private rented accommodation. The amount shown in Dublin is so many times greater than the figure given by the Minister that surely this reflects the fact that the law is not being abided by. Would the Minister look into the question of the contrast between the figures we have for rented accommodation and the amount of registration and see that action is taken to ensure that the law is being abided by?
Comment on this
Is it not a fact that the landlord lobby is much stronger than the flat-dwellers lobby and that is why these inquiries have never been carried out even though the Act has been in operation since 1974?
Comment on this
The Minister of State does not know what the percentages are. He has not got a clue.
Comment on this
The position is that the question asked was in relation to the law requiring the registration of private landlords.
Comment on this
The very first thing any competent Minister would do when such a question is raised is to look at the census to see how many dwellings there are.
Comment on this
It is an awful pity that a census was not taken in 1976. We would then have more up-to-date information.