We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil
‹ Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Postal Dispute.

Revenue lost to the postal strike

Summary

Deasy asks for revenue lost, and Faulkner estimates £11 million in postal and telecommunications revenue. Members probe weekly losses and the figure’s scope; Faulkner says it covers only that departmental revenue and provides no further breakdown.

asked the Minister for Posts and Telegraphs the estimated loss in revenue caused by the postal strike to date.

Comment on this

It is estimated that to date the present strike has resulted in a loss of £11 million in postal and telecommunications revenue.

Comment on this

Has the Minister an estimate of the loss to tourism and industry?

Comment on this

That is a separate question.

Comment on this
Jim Mitchell Mr. Mitchell Fine Gael

Does that mean that the strike is costing the Post Office £1.1 million per week?

Comment on this

I informed the Deputy that the loss to date in postal and telecommunications revenue is £11 million.

Comment on this
Jim Mitchell Mr. Mitchell Fine Gael

For every week that the dispute continues will the postal revenue loss be £1.1 million?

Comment on this

I am sure the Deputy is capable of doing his sums. If that is the way he has worked it out then that must be the position.

Comment on this
Jim O'Keeffe Mr. O'Keeffe Fine Gael

Can the Minister give a breakdown of the figure?

Comment on this

The figure of £11 million represents the revenue which it is estimated would have accrued to the Department since the strike began.

Comment on this
Jim O'Keeffe Mr. O'Keeffe Fine Gael

Is that the breakdown of what has been lost only by the Department of Posts and Telegraphs?

Comment on this

In relation to postal and telecommunications revenue.

Comment on this
Jim O'Keeffe Mr. O'Keeffe Fine Gael

Is that the only aspect included in the figure?

Comment on this

Yes.

Comment on this