Ireland’s Intake of Indo-Chinese Refugees
The Minister clarified that he had not announced an intake of 500; the Government was willing to respond further but faced difficulties securing suitable accommodation. Ireland would accept refugees selected by the UN without qualifications, while also contributing funds; the Minister said refugees could come as soon as the UN High Commissioner sent them and planned to address EEC action at the conference.
Could the Minister clarify the position with regard to Ireland's decision to receive refugees?
24.
Comment on this
asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if, in view of the worsening situation of the Vietnamese refugees, a decision to increase the number to be admitted to this country has been taken.
25.
Comment on this
asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if his attention has been drawn to a newspaper report (details supplied) headlined "Ireland will take another 500 Viet Boat People" and attributed to him in an interview after a meeting of EEC Foreign Ministers in Paris and if he will make a statement on the matter.
Comment on this
With the permission of the Ceann Comhairle, I propose to take Questions No. 24 and 25 together.
Deputy O'Keeffe is no doubt referring to an interview which I gave RTE radio on 18 June after a meeting of EEC Foreign Ministers in Paris. When I was asked, in the course of that interview, whether Ireland would be receiving more than the 100 refugees from Indo-China which had already been announced, I said that I felt sure the Government would make a further positive response towards relieving the terrible plight of the refugees. I did not however, indicate what this response would be in terms of any specific extra numbers of refugees to be admitted to Ireland. The Deputy will be aware that the Government have now taken a decision in principle to admit a further 100 refugees.
Comment on this
Is it the Minister's view that, even increasing the figure to a total of 200, it is a poor response to this awful situation?
Comment on this
I have no knowledge of where these figures came from. I have indicated the Government's readiness to respond to the situation. There are practical problems for the refugees, particularly in relation to the pre-reception stage, which means that before we can indicate the number we must have accommodation to cope effectively with 100 or 200. It is proving very difficult to get that kind of accommodation.
Comment on this
Would the Minister agree with the estimate made by the UN that there are approximately 338,000 refugees in south-east Asia with nowhere to go and no country that holds out any prospect of accepting them? In that context does the Minister agree that the number of places this Government have offered is not at all sufficient? Is any qualification being set as to the type of people being admitted or will all people, of all levels of education, be accepted in the quota?
Comment on this
We are not setting any qualification whatsoever. We will accept exactly those whom the UN High Commissioner selects for us. In addition to the number of actual refugees we have indicated we will accept—which is under the control and administration of the Minister for Defence—the Government are also providing extra funds in this region and the European Community countries as a whole are also making funds available to cope with this question. The matter will become very much clearer after the conference at the weekend.
Comment on this
Is there not a danger that if we do not actually take these people in here soon a number of them will have died in the refugee camps and may never get here and that our saying we will accept them in six months' time will be worth nothing?
Comment on this
We have never said that. We have indicated our willingness to accept them as soon as the UN High Commissioner can send them.
Comment on this
Has there been any concerted effort at EEC level to reduce this appalling catastrophe?