Assurance against another driving-test amnesty
Keating seeks a categorical assurance that the Minister will not again grant an amnesty to clear the test backlog. Barrett says the earlier action was necessary because of the postal dispute and staffing constraints, but offers only that he does not anticipate repeating it.
May I put one final question to the Minister about this whole matter and in support of the general thesis of Deputy Belton? Would the Minister now give a categorical assurance that there will never again be the kind of amnesty or step which he took on this occasion and which, in my view, was seen to be reckless and irresponsible, that this will never again happen so long as he has responsibility in respect of it and that therefore anybody at present awaiting a test should not believe that clemency of the kind extended to other drivers on a previous occasion will ever again recur in the interest of public safety, if nothing else?
Comment on this
That is the Minister's story. There were other actions he could have taken which he did not take.
Comment on this
——as a result of the postal dispute. There was no other option open to me. As I explained in reply to these questions, it takes so long to recruit further staff——
Comment on this
It is not important whether the Minister anticipates it or not. Can he say that it will not happen?