Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - County Galway River Drainage.
asked the Minister for Finance the up-to-date position regarding the drainage of the Dunkillin River, County Galway.
Comment on this
Since the matter was last raised by the Deputy in December 1978, some progress has been made on the design of a drainage scheme for the Dunkellin catchment. However, much still remains to be done and I could not say at this stage when the preparation of the scheme will be completed.
Comment on this
I should like to welcome the Minister. This is his first time answering questions. However, I am thoroughly disappointed with the reply. Is the Minister aware that his predecessor promised me and another Deputy who is present that he would recruit the necessary staff to have the survey carried out immediately and that that was early last year? What progress has been made since then? Have the staff in question been recruited?
Comment on this
The Minister should answer my question. What progress has been made since we met Deputy Wyse?
Comment on this
The Dunkellin is a minor catchment and has been reached in the drainage programmes. Fifteen surveys were completed in 1969 and a certain amount of progress has been made with the design of the scheme.
Comment on this
Is the Minister aware that I have a letter dated 25 March 1980, and it is stated in the last paragraph of that that every endeavour will be made to clear the way for starting the work——
Comment on this
——and that if all goes well this can be achieved in 1972? This is 1980. Is the Minister aware of that?
Comment on this
I should also like to congratulate the Minister. Going back to 1972 is ridiculous. What we want to know is the current position. No Government—the Coalition were in for four years—made any attempt to do anything about it. This river starts at my door and can the Minister give me an assurance that a cost-benefit survey will be carried out so that when we funds from the EEC—we already have received £40 million for arterial drainage——
Comment on this
Following preparations for the scheme the question of a cost-benefit analysis will arise. However, in view of the extent of existing commitments and the amount of work to be done on the Dunkellin scheme it will be some time before the scheme gets under way.
Comment on this
I should like to give notice that I intend to raise this question every time I am allowed, which is about every six months, until such time as something is done about it.