Timber industry support and development
Kelly challenged the Minister over the cost of State-forest thinnings and the timber industry’s ability to compete; the Minister said the claim was no longer true. Members then questioned support for vulnerable indigenous industries and whether a development consortium had reviewed timber’s future; the Minister invited a written question on the consortium.
Is it not a fact that one of the difficulties the timber industry has to labour under is that they are not able to acquire thinnings from State forests at a price which makes the processing of these thinnings economic and that makes it impossible for them to compete with cheap imports from elsewhere? Is that not what has put the industry to the wall?
Comment on this
Is the Minister saying that any assistance given to indigenous industries is a waste of money?
Comment on this
That is the interpretation that can be taken from what he has said. The Minister mentioned one industry which is very vulnerable and it so happens at present that the vulnerable ones are Irish-owned, indigenous industries. What is the Minister doing about it? Is he calling money being spent throwing it up a cul-de-sac?
Comment on this
Would the Minister say whether and, if so, when the Sean Lemass-type industrial development consortium considered the whole question of the timber industry's future?