Fishery Harbours Committee
The Minister opposed a national fishery harbours committee, arguing that local consultations, existing surveys and cost-benefit assessments were better suited to identifying harbour works. Treacy argued that poor coordination was delaying necessary development, but the Minister rejected the committee proposal in the example raised.
asked the Minister for Fisheries and Forestry if he proposes to establish a fishery harbours committee representing fishing interests in order to facilitate the speedy development of harbours for fishing.
Comment on this
I have no proposals at present for the establishment of a fishery harbours committee. Having regard to the wide range of fishery harbour works requiring to be considered all around the coast I doubt if a single committee would prove effective. I feel that the current departmental practice of having prior consultations with the local fishermen in regard to any harbour improvement scheme meets the objectives that the Deputy has in mind.
Comment on this
Is the Minister aware that very many of our harbours are in a truly deplorable condition and that this is stultifying the expansion of the fishing industry and trade and commerce generally? In a situation where it is now known that a ship was built to service one of our island communities and when that ship was completed it transpired that there was no harbour to facilitate the ship, does the Minister consider that there should be co-operation and consultation and that the kind of committee that I recommend would have been of very real value?
Comment on this
What the Deputy has said is not new thinking. A very big fishery harbour survey was carried out, certain areas were classified as places for particular development and there was also a preliminary survey on a county by county basis to itemise different works that would be needed. All the different bodies were contacted and asked to give their thinking on the matter. The engineering works involved, the catch in each individual area and the cost of the work have to be weighed in terms of cost/benefit analysis. Sufficient work is being done at the moment on itemising the different necessary works to be done. Regarding ships coming into the fleet here and not finding suitable harbours for them, it must be remembered that we are now into ships 120 feet long and it is difficult to make provision for those in advance. Who knows what type of ship we will have in a few years' time?
Comment on this
The Minister must agree that there is a lack of co-ordination of effort where a ship designed to service one of our island communities could not find a harbour and is still awaiting the provision of a harbour.
Comment on this
The local factors involved in that could not have been foreseen by anybody in advance.
Comment on this
Does he agree that the kind of liaison that I recommend would be helpful to the Board of Works to accelerate the development of a harbour?