Promotions without professional examinations
Doherty begins giving figures for promotions of members who had not passed the professional examinations; interruptions and procedural exchanges prevent a complete answer in this extract.
The number of promotions to the ranks of sergeant and inspector of members who had not passed——
Comment on this
The Minister of State has been asked a question about his own actions. He is not entitled to say that the Minister for Justice should be asked. Was he or was he not himself in contact with the Commissioner of the Garda Síochána on this matter? That is the question.
Comment on this
——of members who had not passed the professional promotion examinations in each of the six-month periods mentioned, commencing on 1 January 1977 were as follows: To the rank of sergeant: 4, 1, 1, 29, 9, 14, 8.
Comment on this
On a point of order, when a Minister is answering in this House, a Minister of State——
Comment on this
That is not a matter for the Chair. I would point out that I have given almost ten minutes to one question. This is way above the average. I am not allowing any more.
Comment on this
Is it in order for a Minister of State to repudiate responsibility and say that his Minister should be asked? Is there any precedent for that?
Comment on this
The Chair is trying to conduct the proceedings of the House in an orderly manner and is not responsible for Ministers' answers. Question No. 21.
Comment on this
I was hoping to assist by clarifying, on a point of order, as to whether a Minister of State is entitled to say that the matter should be referred to the Minister. Is he not standing in for the Minister and required to answer the question?
Comment on this
(Cavan-Monaghan): The Minister is walking on a thin rope and and if he moves one way or the other he will fall.
Comment on this
I am acknowledging nothing. I have replied to the question as asked in relation to my duties.