Naval Service patrol and maintenance budget
Creed questioned whether reduced estimates for patrol allowances and vessel maintenance would cut duties or leave the Service short of personnel. Moore said no cutback was envisaged, explaining that maintenance spending varies with need and operations would remain adequately funded.
asked the Minister for Defence if there will be any cutback in Naval Service activities due to the reduction being made in the estimate for patrol duty allowance and for the maintenance of vessels.
Comment on this
The Estimate allowance for patrol duty is down from £190,000 to £110,000. The allowance for vessels is down from £8 million to £5 million. On maintenance of vessels it is down from £500,000 to £400,000. Will those reductions have a serious effect on the amount of duty which can be carried out by the Defence forces?
Comment on this
I think the Deputy is mistaken here. This year a certain amount of money could be spent on overhauling a vessel but next year she would not need the same overhaul and less money would be required. Therefore, that would not entail a cut-back in the accepted sense of the word. Money is provided when it is needed.
Comment on this
Would the Minister agree that as a result of this cut-back only 25 per cent of the time necessary will be spent on duties?
Comment on this
I have answered the question. There is no cut-back on Naval Service duties and it is not envisaged either.
Comment on this
If there is a reduction in the Estimate does that mean that there will be a scarcity of men?
Comment on this
It is a matter of operational considerations. We are never short of money for a worthy object. The Deputy knows that.
Comment on this
I am concerned about the reduction in the Estimate. It means one of two things, that one has not the men to do the duty or one is going to have to cut-back on the duty. Which is it?