We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil
‹ Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Defence Equipment.

Twin-engined helicopter acquisition

Summary

Creed asked about delays and a delivery commitment. Moore said a purchase was deferred as manufacturers were replacing models, and the Department intended to lease a helicopter.

asked the Minister for Defence the length of time evaluations and examinations have been going on to acquire a twin-engined helicopter; if there have been delays in acquiring such an aircraft, in view of the quick acquistion of an executive jet by the Air Corps; if similar action could be taken to acquire this vital type of helicopter for the Air Corps; if he will give an undertaking to have such aircraft in service by the end of the year; and if he will give a date for delivery.

Comment on this

As stated in reply to the Deputy's question on 24 June 1980, provision was included in the Defence Vote, 1979, for a down payment on the purchase of a twin-engined helicopter. Tenders were invited with a view to purchase but, as it was indicated by the manufacturers of certain aircraft in which the Defence Forces were interested that these would be phased out of production and replaced with newer models over the next few years, it was decided not to proceed with purchase; it was intended instead to arrange for the lease of a twin-engined helicopter this year. Tenders for the lease of a twin-engined helicopter were invited and, after evaluation, a contract was placed for the lease of a suitable twin-engined helicopter. Delivery is due by the end of May 1981.

Having regard to the necessity for detailed technical investigation and examination of the aircraft offered, including their suitability for the roles required of them and the change in procurement arrangements occasioned by the developments relating to the introduction of new models. I do not consider that there was any undue delay in finalising arrangements for the acquisition of a suitable aircraft in this case.

30.

Comment on this