Longford-Westmeath unemployment and job creation
L'Estrange sought local unemployment figures, the reasons for increases and plans to provide jobs. Calleary attributed the rise to the international recession and cited IDA targets, approved projects, training, infrastructure and public-sector work. The exchange became a dispute over Fianna Fáil’s unemployment promises, before the Ceann Comhairle moved on; the next question was postponed.
asked the Minister for Finance the number of people unemployed at each employment exchange in Longford-Westmeath in February 1980 and 1981; the reason for the increase, if any; and the action the Government intend to take to provide employment for the unemployed in Longford-Westmeath.
Comment on this
The numbers of people registered at each local office in Longford/Westmeath at end January 1981 and end January 1980 are as follows:
The increase in numbers is due to the general effects of the current international recession, The rate of increase for Longford-Westmeath is somewhat less than the national average.
Every effort is being made to create employment in this area. The IDA Industrial Plan 1978-82 has a target of 2,600 new jobs for the Longford-Westmeath area. The Authority have provided 109,500 square feet of factory space in the area and a further 54,000 square feet is planned. They also hold almost 200 acres of land available for industrial development.
Comment on this
Would the Minister not agree that the Government have failed to honour their promises of 1977 in regard to providing work for the unemployed? Would he not agree also that that promise was to reduce unemployment by 80,000 — from 107,000 as it was then to 27,000? Is the figure for unemployment not at least 127,000 today thereby indicating that Fianna Fáil were out in their calculations by 100,000? What action, if any, is planned to provide work for those unfortunate people who were foolish enough to believe that Fianna Fáil could deliver on their promises and to vote for them? Many of these people are now out of work.
Comment on this
That is not so. I am giving the figures as published in black and white in the manifesto.
Comment on this
The first point is that there are more people out of work now than was the case in 1977.
Comment on this
Regarding the Deputy's remarks in relation to Longford-Westmeath, the IDA target for the area is 2,600 new jobs. In the years 1978 and 1979 a total of 71 projects with a job potential of nearly 1,000 people were approved. Indications are that the situation in 1980 was even better and AnCO expect to train 625 workers at a cost of £1.525 million in 1981.
Comment on this
In the investment plan which apparently the Deputy forgot to mention, there is provision for approach roads to Athlone and for a new bridge over the Shannon. In addition, a further 150 staff from the Department of Education will be going to Athlone even if that does not suit Deputy L'Estrange.
Comment on this
If we are to understand now that the figures in the manifesto are totally wrong, how can we be expected to believe in what the Minister is promising? Is the Minister aware of the promise made by Deputy O'Donoghue to put to work all able-bodied unemployed even if that meant digging holes and employing people to fill them again? We have potholes in plenty in every county but we do not have the money to pay the men to fill those potholes.
Comment on this
Is it not a miracle that after four-and-a-half years of silence Deputy L'Estrange has recovered his voice?