We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil
‹ Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Grant Payments.

Cork grant eligibility and delayed decision

Summary

The case involved applications concerning two houses, with an earlier application rejected because the applicant had qualified for a grant on a house in Limerick. The Minister said affidavits and an employer’s statement were needed to clarify eligibility and promised to progress the matter, while Barry raised the hardship caused by delays.

Myra Barry Miss M. Barry

asked the Minister for the Environment the reason for the delay in the payment of a new house grant to a person (details supplied) in County Cork.

Comment on this

There has been no delay in dealing with this case. The person named made two applications relating to two different houses. The later application has been rejected on the grounds that he had previously purchased a house and a decision in regard to the earlier application will be conveyed to the applicant on receipt of a report from the Department's inspector.

Comment on this
Myra Barry Miss M. Barry

Is the Minister aware that two affidavits went in before December last year in relation to that?

Comment on this

I am, and I am having the last application processed as quickly as possible.

Comment on this
Myra Barry Miss M. Barry

That was six months ago.

Comment on this

There was some confusion because it seems that the person purchased two houses.

Comment on this
Myra Barry Miss M. Barry

But he sent in two affidavits explaining the position. The first one was not clear enough and he sent in a second one last November. When did the applicant first apply for the grant?

Comment on this

An application was received in respect of a house in County Cork in January 1980 but was rejected in February 1980 as the person had already purchased a house in County Limerick which qualified for the £1,000 grant.

Comment on this
Myra Barry Miss M. Barry

Is the Minister aware of the hardship being caused to young people because the promised grant is not being paid out for a year or a year and a half?

Comment on this

We had confusion here where two applications were made and we had to get clarification. Since then we got a sworn affidavit to establish that the applicant complied with the conditions attaching to the grant. A statement from the applicants' employer was only received in the Department on 6 March 1981. There was a lot of correspondence in this case. I will be as helpful as possible.

45.

Comment on this