Disposal of Galway Harbour lands
Molloy pressed for an early decision on disposing of 38 acres at Lough Atalia and allocating part to the Galway Harbour Commissioners. Fitzpatrick said interdepartmental queries remained outstanding, identified Transport as the department yet to reply, and promised reminders to avoid further delay; members disputed how long the matter had been under consideration. The Chair then moved to Question No. 4, preventing further questioning on this issue.
asked the Minister for Fisheries and Forestry if he will take an early decision on the question of disposing of 38 acres of land adjacent to Galway Harbour which are owned by his Department; and if he will ensure that a substantial portion of these lands is allocated to Galway Harbour Commisioners to assist in their efforts to promote trade through Galway Harbour.
Comment on this
(Cavan-Monaghan): The question of disposal of the lands acquired by the State at Lough Atalia, Galway, is at present under examination and in this connection the request of the Galway Harbour Commisioners for portion of the lands will be considered if it should be decided to dispose of the property.
Comment on this
Will the Minister ensure that a decision is made on this matter at an early date? I understand that he is free to dispose of these lands now since his predecessor transferred the major fishery harbour designation from Galway to Rossaveal in May. The matter is of great importance for the future development of Galway Harbour and employment prospects in that area.
Comment on this
(Cavan-Monaghan): It would be my wish to dispose of the lands but I am sure the Deputy is aware that it is necessary to consult Departments other than my own. Some queries are still outstanding but I will expedite the matter.
Comment on this
Is it true that those other Departments were consulted quite some time ago? They should have had ample time to make their views known to the Minister's Department. Will the Minister indicate the Departments, if any, that have not made their views known on this matter to his Department?
Comment on this
(Cavan-Monaghan): What the Minister has said may or may not be so but the Minister will appreciate that I am only responsible for any delay that has taken place within a very short time.
Comment on this
I am just reminding the House that it is 18 months since Deputy Molloy was a Minister.
Comment on this
(Cavan-Monaghan): I should like to tell the Deputy that there are some queries outstanding and reminders will be sent to the Department, or Departments, concerned and there will be no further avoidable delay.
Comment on this
The Minister indicated that the matter was under consideration by his Department but I should like to know how long it has been under consideration by the Department.
Comment on this
(Cavan-Monaghan): It appears that it was at least under consideration during the life of the last Government.
Comment on this
Will the Minister indicate the Departments that have not made their views known on this matter?
Comment on this
(Cavan-Monaghan): No. The Department of Transport have not yet replied. That is an important Department.
Comment on this
I am sorry but I have moved to Question No. 4. In the interests of fair play I have moved on to No. 4.
Comment on this
——seeing that he has passed the buck backwards if he would co-operate with the House to the extent of making it aware where the delays have taken place?