We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil
‹ Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Establishment of Committees.

Marital Breakdown and Family Welfare Committees

Summary

Shatter and FitzGerald press for committees on marital breakdown and child and family welfare, questioning the Taoiseach about reported commitments and their terms. He says the Government is considering the number and scope of committees and is willing to discuss them with the Opposition, but makes no firm commitment.

asked the Taoiseach if he intends to establish an all-party committee on marital breakdown; if so, when this committee will be established; the nature of this committee; their terms of reference; and whether the Government will regard themselves as being bound to introduce any legislation recommended by the committee.

16.

Comment on this

asked the Taoiseach whether it is intended to set up an Oireachtas committee on child and family welfare; when this committee will be established; the nature of their terms of reference; and how this committee will differ from the special committee on marital breakdown.

17.

Comment on this

asked the Taoiseach when he proposes to move the establishment of an all-party Oireachtas committee on child and family welfare.

Comment on this

With the permission of the Ceann Comhairle, I propose to take Questions Nos. 15, 16 and 17 together.

The question of the establishment of Oireachtas committees is at present under consideration.

Comment on this

I refer the Taoiseach to an alleged agreement concluded between himself and Deputy Gregory which was referred to in The Irish Times of 10 March 1982 regarding matters other than inner-city development which was the sole matter he directed himself to when answering the previous questions. There is a submission in that document under the heading “Laws” that the constitutional ban on divorce will await findings of the special committee on marital breakdown. Arising from that, does the Taoiseach propose to establish an all-party committee on marital breakdown? What terms of reference does he envisage for them? How many Members of the House does the Taoiseach propose to place on the committee? When does he intend that the committee will be established? Will this Government accept the recommendations of such a committee?

Comment on this

I have already explained to the Deputy that the question of what committees should be established by this Dáil is at present under consideration by the Government. It is my belief that it is necessary to proceed cautiously in this area. I have already explained in regard to this matter during the last Dáil that it is a simple matter to set up a number of Oireachtas committees to deal with whatever concept comes into the mind of any particular Deputy. The trouble is to get committees to work. It is essential to limit the number of such committees if we are to have effective committees. This is something that is very much present in my mind in trying to decide what committees we should establish, how many and what areas we should cover.

Comment on this

Is there no substance to the alleged agreement concluded between Deputy Gregory in which it appears that the Taoiseach promised that such a committee would be established? Is there any substance to the idea of a committee on child and family welfare which was promised to Deputy Gregory? In what way will this committee differ from the committee on marital breakdown?

Comment on this

My experience in this House, going back over a long number of year, teaches me that it is a simple matter to set up an Oireachtas committee. It is infinitely more difficult to try to ensure that committees function effectively and perform the duties they were set up to do. The form of committees we may or may not establish in this Dáil and the areas they will cover is something to which I will give careful consideration and which I hope to be in a position to discuss with the Opposition parties.

Comment on this

I am aware of the Taoiseach's reluctance to have committees of this House in which Independent Deputies could play a role, having suffered from him dragging his feet on this point for six months of last year. In relation to the published version of this agreement when will the Taoiseach be seeking the agreement of all parties in the House to the establishment of an Oireachtas committee on child and family welfare which is item 3 under the heading "Family and Children," subheading "Welfare" in the printed version?

Comment on this

I have nothing to add except by way of helpful explanation. There are many areas which Deputies on all sides would wish to see the subject of examination by Oireachtas committees. It is very important that we decide for ourselves how many such committees we can effectively set up and service. Following that we can decide what areas, particularly in the social area, the different committees should cover so that they will be effective and avoid overlapping.

Comment on this

Having discussed and reached agreement on this matter with Deputy Gregory, would the Taoiseach be prepared to discuss and reach agreement with me on the question of committees? When could we meet to have this discussion?

Comment on this

I am prepared to talk to the Deputy at any time about these matters. With the exception of one committee on which we disagreed as a matter of principle in the last Dáil, the Deputy found me oncoming in regard to the other committees he had in mind. My only doubt, which I expressed freely and openly, was whether we were taking the risk of establishing too many committees, perhaps to the detriment of their efficiency.

Comment on this

The Taoiseach did express this view to me when he was Leader of the Opposition but I could not describe him as oncoming as he held up the establishment of committees by refusing to answer my letters for a period of six months. Is the Taoiseach prepared to discuss this matter with me next week?

Comment on this

Certainly.

Comment on this