Whether a Unity Declaration Is Coercive
Cluskey argues that urging Britain to favour Irish unity could be seen as coercion by Northern Ireland’s majority and asks whether coercion is ruled out. The Taoiseach rejects that view and says such a declaration would be helpful; procedural exchanges delay a repeated answer.
Would the Taoiseach not agree that a declaration by the British Government which he is urging to the effect that they wish to work towards or should work towards a united Ireland may, and indeed would be interpreted by the majority in Northern Ireland as a form of coercion? Does or does not the Taoiseach rule out coercion as a means of solving this problem, unequivocally rule it out whether by himself or by other Governments?
Comment on this
Would the Taoiseach not agree that it would be viewed by the majority in Northern Ireland as a form of coercion?
Comment on this
Certainly. Does the Taoiseach not agree that if he is urging the British Government or any other Government but particularly the British Government, to declare in favour of a united Ireland, that this could and would be regarded by the majority in Northern Ireland as a form of coercion? Does or does not the Taoiseach unequivocally rule out coercion as a means of solving this problem? If he does, does he not see it as using coercion by proxy to try to get some other Government?