We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil
‹ Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Waterford Unemployment.

Waterford unemployment figures

Summary

The Minister reported Waterford city live-register figures rising from 2,059 in 1979 to 3,698 in March 1982, while county-office totals rose from 422 to 832. Deasy called the situation catastrophic and sought special treatment; Ahern said requests about recent closures and future employment prospects should be directed to the Minister for Industry and Energy.

asked the Taoiseach the most recent unemployment figures for Waterford city and county; and the corresponding figures for each of the last three years.

Comment on this
Bertie Ahern Minister of State at the Department of the Taoiseach (Mr. B. Ahern) Fianna Fáil

The latest information available on the number of persons on the live register relates to 26 March 1982. On that date the number of persons on the live register at Waterford city employment exchange was 3,698. At the corresponding dates in each of the last three years the figures were as follows: 1981, 2,871; 1980, 1,951; 1979, 2,059.

For the other local employment offices in County Waterford the aggregate live register totals on the same dates were: 1982, 832; 1981, 715; 1980, 468; 1979, 422.

Comment on this

Obviously those figures do not include the latest factory closures in Waterford. Would the Minister agree that the figures are catastrophic and that something urgently needs to be done to improve the employment situation in Waterford city and county?

Comment on this

The information I have given is of a statistical nature. I do not know to what date the Deputy is referring in respect of recent figures. If he will put down a separate question in that regard to the Minister for Industry and Energy perhaps the matter can then be dealt with.

Comment on this

Does the Minister agree that the figures are way above the national average and, as a consequence, that he might give special treatment to Waterford when it comes to future employment prospects?

Comment on this

That is a separate question proper to the Minister for Industry and Energy.

Comment on this