Restrictions on Private Notice Questions
O’Toole challenges the refusal of his Private Notice Question and says he will raise the matter on the Adjournment. The Chair says the rules required several refusals and should be reviewed to allow more questions.
I sought to raise a matter by way of a Private Notice Question but find that it has been disallowed. This is a very serious matter. The law has been administered in a selective manner not in accordance with the principles of natural justice. I would ask why this question was not allowed.
Comment on this
I do not have to explain the reasons now. I had to refuse no fewer than four Private Notice Questions under the existing rules. There are many problems about this and I feel it is a matter which should be dealt with by the Committee on Procedure and Privileges in order to allow more such questions to be asked.
Comment on this
No, I am bound by the rules. It is not my fault that the questions were refused. This is one of the most serious matters which will have to be dealt with by the Committee on Procedure and Privileges and I have written to both sides asking them to nominate members of the committee so that we can get down to the business of enabling more work to be undertaken in the House and greater latitude on the Order of Business and in relation to Private Notice Questions. Perhaps the rules are too restrictive at present.