We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil
‹ Ceisteanna — Questions. Oral Answers

Cork court decision and rent restrictions

Summary

Allen challenges the refusal of a Private Notice Question about a Cork court decision affecting the Rent Restrictions Act. The Chair says the matter is sub judice and cannot be discussed.

I attempted to table a Private Notice Question about a court decision in Cork which has serious implications in regard to the Rent Restrictions (Temporary Provisions) Act, 1982 but I was informed by the Chair that it was out of order.

Comment on this
John F. O'Connell An Ceann Comhairle Fianna Fáil

The matter is sub judice.

Comment on this

I understand that but when we draft legislation we do so to protect the people of the country.

Comment on this
John F. O'Connell An Ceann Comhairle Fianna Fáil

When a matter becomes sub judice we are not permitted to discuss it.

Comment on this

Surely if we draft legislation——

Comment on this
John F. O'Connell An Ceann Comhairle Fianna Fáil

I think the Deputy has made his point. I would point out that I am not obliged to give the Deputy a reason for not allowing a question. I looked at the matter carefully and tried to see if it could be raised by way of Private Notice Question but I found it could not.

Comment on this

Does it mean that the people are left at the mercy of decisions by judges, whether they be good or bad, and have no protection?

Comment on this
John F. O'Connell An Ceann Comhairle Fianna Fáil

I cannot help the Deputy any further on the matter. I am sorry about this but he has made his point.

Comment on this