Dog population and control
Hussey asked about legislation, low licensing rates and a self-financing dog-control system. Brady said responsibility for the relevant laws lay mainly with Agriculture and that his Department and local authorities lacked statutory control functions; after Dukes pressed him about a reported scheme and local authority facilities, Brady undertook to look into it.
asked the Minister for the Environment if he is preparing legislation to deal with the increasing dog population of this country and the resulting serious social problems created by such an increase in numbers.
32.
Comment on this
asked the Minister for the Environment if, in view of the statement of the National Action Committee for Dog Control that only about 18 per cent of dogs in Ireland are licensed, he will undertake a new self-financing system of dog control.
33.
Comment on this
asked the Minister for the Environment the action he proposes to take arising out of the recent memorandum from the National Action Committee for Dog Control which suggested the establishment of a council for dog control and a self-financing system for dog control for the whole county.
Comment on this
(Dublin South-East): I propose, with the permission of the Ceann Comhairle, to take Questions Nos. 31 to 33, inclusive together.
Departmental responsibility for the Dogs Act, 1906, and the Diseases of Animals Act, 1966, rests primarily with the Department of Agriculture and the preparation of proposals for any amendment of these codes would therefore be a matter for that Department. Neither my Department nor the local authorities have any statutory functions in regard to the licensing or other control of dog numbers and this limits the relevance for my Department of the memorandum referred to. Planning authorities are, however, empowered to assist a body or persons providing homes or shelters for stray or unwanted dogs or cats and my Department operate a scheme of grants for the recoupment to planning authorities of 50 per cent of the expenditure incurred by them on such purposes. A sum of £75,000 is provided in my Department's Vote to finance this scheme in the current year. While, therefore, as I have explained, the local authorities do not have a direct responsibility in regard to control of dog numbers, this scheme enables them to play an important supportive role in dealing with some of the problems involved.
Comment on this
Is the Minister of State aware that his colleague, the Minister of State at the Department of Agriculture, has been reported as saying that he is now preparing a scheme along the lines of the one raised by Deputy Hussey? Will he agree that local authorities have a greater role to play that he has indicated in that it is they who must provide the sites and the facilities for dog pounds if the scheme is to be implemented?
Comment on this
(Dublin South-East): I am fully aware of the role local authorities play in this respect. I have had eight years experience in Dublin Corporation and the matter was raised on many occasions. If the Deputy studies the content of my reply, I think he will agree that it covers adequately the questions that have been asked of me on this occasion.
Comment on this
My question was to establish if the Minister of State was aware that one of his colleagues has said he is preparing legislation in an area in which he said his Department are involved. Can he give us any further details about that?