We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil
‹ Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Meeting with Garda Chiefs.

Garda strength in Cavan-Monaghan

Summary

Deputies challenged the Minister over reported Garda reductions, including nine fewer personnel at Monaghan headquarters. He maintained that divisional strength had not fallen and that security was adequate or improved, distinguishing numbers from security levels.

(Cavan-Monaghan): When further Garda recruits become available, if not before then, will the Minister restore the Cavan-Monaghan division to full strength? Is he aware that in the last few months the Garda strength there has been greatly depleted? This is to be deplored especially in an area where serious crime is prevalent.

Comment on this

The deployment of gardaí is a matter for the commissioner. The strength of the Cavan-Monaghan division has not been reduced and security in that area is equal to what it has been in the past.

Comment on this

(Cavan-Monaghan): Is the Minister aware that in answer to a written question put down by me within the last week or two he said that the divisional headquarters in Monaghan was reduced by nine within a month and that there were more gardaí transferred from there in recent months?

Comment on this

The reduction in physical terms does not bear any relation to a reduction suggested by the Deputy in relation to security. The security level in the division is adequate, it has not been reduced but rather improved.

Comment on this

(Cavan-Monaghan): Does the Minister not realise——

Comment on this
John F. O'Connell An Ceann Comhairle Fianna Fáil

We have had eight supplementaries on this question.

Comment on this

(Cavan-Monaghan): A few minutes ago the Minister told me there was no reduction in the strength.

Comment on this

The Deputy is confused about a reduction in strength and a reduction in security.

Comment on this

(Cavan-Monaghan): I am talking about numbers. The Minister is waffling and wobbling.

Comment on this

I am concerned about security.

Comment on this

Would the Minister not agree that he just told the House there was no depletion in numbers having given a written reply saying the numbers had been reduced by nine? Will he tell the House how he places such weight on increases in numbers as being important to security elsewhere but a reduction in numbers in the border area as being unimportant to security?

Comment on this

I do not agree with that.

Comment on this

The Minister cannot answer that.

Comment on this

I have answered it.

Comment on this