Shannon flood survey delay
Naughten and Enright challenged the Government’s failure to start the Shannon survey, citing budget provision and EEC funding; Barrett blamed the public-service recruitment embargo and shortage of staff. He said the survey would take three years, the EEC allocation would not be lost, and the OPW intended to begin when staff became available.
asked the Minister for Finance if the survey of the River Shannon has commenced and, if so, the number of staff employed.
Comment on this
(Clare): The proposed survey of the Shannon flood problem has not yet commenced and consequently no staff are employed at present.
Comment on this
Why has the survey not commenced? Why were staff not employed to carry out the survey in view of the fact that money was made available for this in the January budget and that it is being subsidised by the EEC?
Comment on this
(Clare): On 26 May 1981 sanction was given to recruit the necessary engineering staff and specialists in particular fields. One person was appointed before the embargo on recruitment in the public service in July 1981. The embargo still exists. It is hoped, as a result of an investigation which was carried in OPW, that we might be able to allocate staff to this. At present this is not possible because of the volume of work. There is a specific sum of money in the Estimate for this.
Comment on this
Is it not a fact that there is no real commitment by the Government to carry out this survey and that the embargo the Minister referred to is being used as a blocking procedure and one to save expenditure because the money has been used to finance the Gregory and other deals made by the Government?
Comment on this
There has been a complete failure by the Government to carry out this desirable survey on the Shannon which different organisations have called for over a number of years.
Comment on this
(Clare): Sanction for recruitment of the staff I referred to was granted in May 1981 under the second last Government. Due to the embargo imposed by his Government the following July——
Comment on this
(Clare): I am only giving the facts. There is no question of not wanting to spend money on it. There is provision in the Estimate for it this year and it is a matter of having suitable staff to commence the work. Apart from further recruitment at present we are investigating the possibility of transferring staff from OPW. I am not saying we will be able to do this but we are examining the possibility.
Comment on this
Is it not a fact that £400,000 was allocated by the EEC for this study which was to have been completed by the end of this year? If the Minister reads his brief properly he will find that information is in it. Is there a danger of this money being lost because of the Department's failure to carry out the work? Is the Minister aware that the previous Government provided money in the Estimates for this study? Why has the Minister's Department not carried out the survey? If they are not going to do the work will they appoint a firm of consultants to carry it out?
Comment on this
(Clare): We intend to carry out the work. The survey does not have to be completed this year. It will take three years and the EEC will finance it to the tune of 40 per cent each year. This year's allocation from the EEC will not be lost if the work is not commenced before the end of this year. It is the intention of the Office of Public Works to carry out the survey at the earliest possible time when we have the staff available.