Fuel VAT relief for elderly people
Leyden sought immediate relief from the 5% VAT on fuel, citing its impact on elderly fuel-voucher recipients. The Ceann Comhairle ruled it a separate question and disallowed discussion, directing Members to raise it during the budget debate; Leyden and Gallagher challenged the ruling.
Would the Minister make provision immediately to alleviate the 5 per cent VAT imposition on fuel, which will have a very serious effect on elderly people in receipt of fuel vouchers? I raise that matter as it is one of grave urgency resulting from the budget in the preparation and presentation of which the Minister collaborated.
Comment on this
I recall, when I was Minister of State that I decided to take questions, as requested or not. Has there been a change in the precedent?
Comment on this
On a point of order, a Cheann Comhairle, I am putting a question to the Minister in relation to a very urgent matter which has arisen as a result of the budget introduced yesterday. I recall that when I was over on those benches if a Deputy put a question to me, I would, if possible, answer that question. The Chair did not protect me.
Comment on this
There is no question of the Chair protecting anybody. The Chair, having before him the question and hearing the supplementary question, decides whether it is a separate question. I am ruling that it is a separate question.
Comment on this
A Cheann Comhairle, does the fact that the Minister has not answered indicate that his answer would be in the negative?
Comment on this
On a point of order, a Cheann Comhairle, this has serious repercussions for any Member of this House. Are you now saying, Sir, that you will decide on the content of supplementary questions? What precedent are you using, a Cheann Comhairle?
Comment on this
I am referring the Deputy to the Standing Order dealing with supplementary questions which confers on the Chair a discretion both as to the number and content of supplementary questions.
Comment on this
On a point of order, would the Ceann Comhairle not deviate from the usual practice on this occasion in view of the fact that it is a matter of national importance for the elderly?
Comment on this
There is another reason why this type of question cannot be allowed. We are having a budget debate and this affords ample opportunity to raise this matter.