IIRS Limerick laboratories
The Minister said no provision was made in the 1983 Estimates for the proposed electronics and metrology laboratories at the NIHE campus in Limerick, citing the difficult Exchequer position and noting the previous Government’s decision. O’Malley disputed the account, pressed for clarity on whether the project would proceed, and was told consideration was ongoing but no expenditure was provided for that year; the Chair then moved to the next question and declined a further supplementary.
asked the Minister for Industry and Energy the present position relating to the electronics and metrology laboratory of the Institute for Industrial Research and Standards which is proposed for the NIHE campus in Limerick.
Comment on this
Because of the extremely difficult Exchequer position, the present Government have no alternative but to uphold the decision of the previous Government not to make any provision in the 1983 Estimates for the IIRS electronics and metrology laboratory for Limerick.
Comment on this
Will the Minister accept that as of 6 October last a figure of £1 million for 1983 was included for this purpose in the Estimates and that some time in the month of November the Department of Finance found it necessary, because of the serious loss of money referred to in Question No. 14 by Deputy Reynolds, to shift that £1 million from Limerick towards paying some of the serious overrun in expenditure in Dublin? In those circumstances will the Minister take steps to ensure that some money at least is restored for this purpose in 1983 so that the decision to build the laboratories can be proceeded with?
Comment on this
I must point out that the decision not to include a provision of £1 million in the 1983 Estimate was taken by the previous Government. It was upheld by the Coalition Government primarily because of a difficult Exchequer position which the last Government also experienced.
Comment on this
The Minister should reply to my supplementary. The Chair can see how Deputies can get frustrated when putting questions to this Minister of State. My supplementary was specific but the reply given by the Minister of State is exactly the same as the one he gave to the original question. The Minister of State also evaded answering the question put by Deputy Reynolds.
Comment on this
The Deputy is aware, more than I, that the Chair does not have any control over how questions are answered.
Comment on this
I appreciate that but it is infrequent in the House that questions are answered as incompetently as they are at present. If some effort was made to answer the questions asked the kind of difficulties the Chair and the House are experiencing could be avoided.
Comment on this
It may not be to the Deputy's liking to be told that his Government excluded any provision in the Estimates for the Limerick project for 1983.
Comment on this
The Deputy's attack on me is ill-founded and is not in the best traditions of the House.
Comment on this
Will the Minister for State tell the House whether it is intended to go ahead with the decision to build laboratories in Limerick?
Comment on this
I have told the Deputy that provision was not made by the last Government or the present Government.
Comment on this
That is not an answer to my question. Is it now proposed to go ahead? Is the planning process still proceeding or has it been stopped?
Comment on this
Consideration of that project is ongoing but provision was not made this year for any expenditure.
Comment on this
I indicated to the Chair that I wished to ask a supplementary question because I have a specific interest in the educational aspect of this matter.