Fairview case and request for a Ministerial statement
Woods sought a Justice Minister’s statement on the Fairview manslaughter and related robberies, arguing that the case raised public concern and questions about future law. The Ceann Comhairle ruled the matter could not be raised then and pointed to a future Criminal Justice Bill; Woods and other Opposition deputies challenged the ruling, including over a refused Private Notice Question. The Chair maintained the ruling and called the next business.
I should like to ask the Minister for Justice if he will make a statement about the action he plans to take——
Comment on this
This is a matter of wide-spready public concern now. I believe that the manner in which this matter of the manslaughter in Fairview and the robberies involved——
Comment on this
This matter needs to be considered by the House in relation to future development of the law. People outside are worried——
Comment on this
It appears that an incident in Assam may be raised here but not an incident in Fairview. We have to address ourselves to that problem.
Comment on this
Perhaps the Chair would meet Deputy Woods and let us know how we can raise this matter in an orderly way. It is a matter of major importance.
Comment on this
With the greatest respect, I think Deputy Ahern should advise Deputy Woods. I am calling the next business.
Comment on this
It is not as simple as that. It is a matter of the laws of this House being questioned outside. I only asked that the Minister for Justice would at least bring a report to the House and have the matter assessed so that we could being forward better law in future and make sure this kind of thing cannot happen again.
Comment on this
The Deputy asked the Taoiseach this morning about a new Criminal Justice Bill. If and when that comes before the House it will afford an excellent opportunity for Deputy Woods to put his questions.
Comment on this
On a point of order, you are faced with a difficulty now. We have had much discussion here about reform of the House——
Comment on this
The Deputy is being disorderly and he knows it. I ask him to resume his seat. The Deputy is being persistently obstructive of the Chair. I am telling him to resume his seat.
Comment on this
I should like clarification on a point of order. I appreciate that in the context of a Criminal Justice Bill one may discuss these points which are very important matters, but the problem is that so far as the public are concerned they would like a statement from the Minister.
Comment on this
I put down a Private Notice Question that was not allowed. Does the Chair appreciate that there is a crisis situation existing in my constituency in relation to that matter?
Comment on this
Does the Chair appreciate that there is a crisis situation in my constitutency in relation to the matter——
Comment on this
Does the Chair appreciate the position in relation to that area? There is a crisis situation——
Comment on this
You cannot be surprised if we on this side of the House are slightly puzzled by the fact that you permitted a Private Notice Question yesterday on events in India in the province of Assam and you refused two questions today.
Comment on this
The Leader of the Opposition is bound by the rules of the House as is every other Deputy.
Comment on this
I do not have to explain anything in this way to Deputy Haughey. If he wishes to come to my office——
Comment on this
I should like to have written replies to Questions Nos. 284 and 285. I am sorry to disappoint you, a Cheann Comhairle.