We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil
‹ Ceisteanna—Questions . Oral Answers . - Mackerel Landings .

Rathmullen harbour berths

Summary

Gallagher argued that Rathmullen’s two berths were inadequate for a port landing 28,000 tonnes and sought an extension. The Minister accepted the port’s scale but treated harbour expansion as a separate question.

: Would the Minister accept that in terms of tonnage this is now the second largest port in the country and that in view of this Rathmullen in Lough Swilly should be entitled to more than two berths, which are not adequate for a landing of 28,000 tonnes?

Comment on this

: I fully accept that.

Comment on this
Thomas J. Fitzpatrick An Ceann Comhairle Fine Gael

: Question No. 6.

Comment on this

: Arising out of the Minister's reply——

Comment on this
Thomas J. Fitzpatrick An Ceann Comhairle Fine Gael

: This is a statistical question. We cannot discuss the whole policy.

Comment on this

: I will be brief. Since the Minister accepts that this is the second largest port in the country and that it has only two berths, would he accept that there should be an extension to the harbour?

Comment on this
Thomas J. Fitzpatrick An Ceann Comhairle Fine Gael

: That is certainly another question.

Comment on this

: It is a separate question. I accept the first part and that is the best I can do.

6.

Comment on this