Ceisteanna—Questions . Oral Answers . - P & T Staff Transfer .
- P&T transfer to Waterford 8 speeches
Fahey pressed for the timing and urgency of transferring about 400 staff to Waterford. Donnellan initially said the Government’s scheme was proceeding and undertook to note the request for speed.
John Fahey, John F. Donnellan
- Decentralisation to Dundalk 3 speeches
Reynolds asked whether decentralisation to Dundalk was going ahead; the Ceann Comhairle said it was a separate question not directed to this Minister.
Albert Reynolds, Thomas J. Fitzpatrick
- Cancellation of Waterford transfer 6 speeches
Wilson asked how the Waterford announcement was made, and Donnellan clarified that the scheme was not proceeding. Fahey condemned the reversal as a broken commitment amid Waterford unemployment; Donnellan cited projected savings of £5 million in 1983 and over £40 million in later years.
John P. Wilson, John F. Donnellan, John Fahey, Thomas J. Fitzpatrick
asked the Minister for Posts and Telegraphs if any section of his Department will be transferred to Waterford under the decentralisation scheme.
Comment on this
: The Government decided on 2 February 1983 and announced the decision on 9 February 1983 that the scheme, which will involve the transfer of about 400 staff, is now proceeding.
Comment on this
: Is the Minister of State aware of the urgency of the matter? Will he ensure that it is proceeding with all possible haste?
Comment on this
: Could the Minister confirm that this is the only decentralisation programme which is going ahead? I do not recall any Government statement in the matter. Would the Minister enlighten the House as to whether decentralisation to Dundalk is going ahead?
Comment on this
: In what format was this announcement? Was it an official release from the public service or from Posts and Telegraphs or in what format was it made by the Government?
Comment on this
: I cannot give details of the exact form of the announcement but it was decided on 2 February 1983 and the Government announced the decision on 9 February that this scheme, which would involve the transfer of 400 of the staff to Waterford, is not proceeding.
Comment on this
: Sin scéal eile. The Minister left out the negative the first time. Jumping Jehoshaphat, what next?
Comment on this
: This bears out what I said. Apart from a Government decision, it is obvious now why we could see no development as far as a transfer of this section of the Department to Waterford is concerned. This is a shame as far as this Government are concerned, with the widespread unemployment in Waterford especially among young people who are crying out for jobs and especially for this type of work. I am shocked that this commitment has been reneged on by this Government.