We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil
‹ Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - National Cattle Herd.

Slaughtering levels and cattle disease

Summary

Noonan questioned how slaughterings could be up while plants were closing or reducing work, and asked whether disease eradication explained the increase. The Minister repeated the 8 per cent rise, said disease was not necessarily the cause, and noted that disease incidence was falling.

(Limerick West): In view of what the Minister has stated in his reply regarding Question No. 33, that slaughterings this year are up by 8 per cent, how can he reconcile that statement with what has already been stated by his party colleague, Deputy Durkan, that a number of meat factories are closing down and a number of others are on a three-day week?

Comment on this

As I stated, the number of slaughterings in 1983 is up by 8 per cent over the corresponding period in 1982. If some plants are doing excessively good business, I can only congratulate them.

Comment on this

(Limerick West): Would the Minister consider that the increase in slaughterings is due to the high incidence of cattle being eradicated because of disease, both TB and brucellosis?

Comment on this

Not necessarily.

Comment on this

(Limerick West): Could the Minister give us the different figures?

Comment on this

I would want to have a volume with me, not just a few questions. That is a different question altogether from that on the Order Paper.

Comment on this

(Limerick West): Would the Minister reply yes or no?

Comment on this

That more cattle are being slaughtered under the disease eradication programme, whether for bovine TB or brucellosis, is not the answer.

Comment on this
Thomas J. Fitzpatrick An Ceann Comhairle Fine Gael

That is a separate question.

Comment on this

From my information the incidence is showing a reduction which would indicate that that would be the very reverse of what the Deputy is insinuating in his question.

Comment on this