Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Ministerial Advisers.
- Ministerial advisers and appointments 2 speeches
The Taoiseach reported the resignation of economic adviser Jim O’Leary and the appointment of Attracta Halpin as arts adviser on a Government-duration contract at £16,652.
Gene Fitzgerald, Garrett Fitzgerald
- Transfer of Question No. 56 20 speeches
Fitzgerald challenged the transfer and incomplete appearance of Question No. 56 on the Order Paper. The Chair ruled the matter unrelated to Question No. 10, said it had no control over transfers, and offered to communicate with him about raising it on the Adjournment.
Gene Fitzgerald, Thomas J. Fitzpatrick, Edward Collins
- Replacement for Attracta Halpin 2 speeches
Wilson asked whether a replacement for Halpin at the National Council for Educational Awards had been sanctioned; the Taoiseach understood that it had.
John P. Wilson, Garrett Fitzgerald
asked the Taoiseach the name, rank, salary, allowances and terms and conditions of employment of advisers and assistants, other than civil servants, at present employed by him or his Ministers of State.
Comment on this
The only changes, since my reply of 8 March 1983, to a similar question from the Deputy, were: (i) the resignation of Mr. Jim O'Leary, economic adviser on 18 May, and (ii) the appointment of Ms. Attracta Halpin as a special adviser (Arts Officer) on 5 October in the place of Mr. Tony Cronin, adviser on cultural affairs, whose contract expired on the 30 June 1983. Ms. Halpin has been appointed on a contract basis for the duration of the Government at her existing salary of £16,652 on secondment from the National Council for Educational Awards.
Comment on this
I thank the Taoiseach for his reply. May I ask him why he transferred two questions which appear on today's Order Paper, Nos. 56 and 59, from his Department?
Comment on this
I hope so. I want to refer to Question No. 56 on today's Order Paper.
Comment on this
I ask the Chair to bear with me and not to rule me out of order.
Comment on this
Question No. 56 was down in its entirety to the Taoiseach but, obviously due to some error, it does not appear in full on the Order Paper.
Comment on this
The Deputy will have to bear with the Chair. We are dealing with Question No. 10 and Deputy Fitzgerald's supplementary in no way relates to that question.
Comment on this
I suggest that Question No. 56——
Comment on this
Let us be realistic. We are not going to reach Question No. 56 today. It should have been on today's Order Paper in its entirely but for some reason it is not. Why is it not in full on the Order Paper?
Comment on this
The Chair has no control over the transfer of questions. I understand Deputy Fitzgerald received a communication about that question.
Comment on this
Am I right in saying that there was an error made but that it did not take place in the Taoiseach's office?
Comment on this
If the Deputy wants to discuss this matter with the Chair he is welcome to come to my office.
Comment on this
Thank you for that offer. May I raise the subject matter of that question in its entirety on today's Adjournment?
Comment on this
Was there sanction for a replacement for Ms. Halpin in the National Council for Educational Awards?