Veto and strength of opposition
MacSharry pressed the Taoiseach on whether the proposals were “totally” unacceptable, while Byrne repeatedly demanded a yes-or-no answer on using the veto. The Taoiseach maintained that “unacceptable” was clear, rejected a simple veto commitment as an inappropriate framing, and said the levy would harm Ireland’s economy and the benefits of EEC membership.
The Taoiseach has mentioned the unacceptability of the proposals for the super levy. Can he say whether these proposals are unacceptable or totally unacceptable to his Government?
Comment on this
The introduction of adverbs and qualifying adjectives weakens and does not strengthen the case.
Comment on this
They are not totally unacceptable as far as the Taoiseach is concerned. Is that the position?
Comment on this
I shall not introduce any adjectives, because the word "unacceptable" is perfectly clear.
Comment on this
Can the Taoiseach tell us if he will use the veto if this super levy is to be imposed upon us? I want a reply, yes or no.
Comment on this
I have already replied to that question in connection with Deputy Collins, who has a fuller understanding of the mechanism by which the Community work than possibly the Deputy has had an opportunity to acquire.
Comment on this
Could I ask for a yes or no answer to my question? Does he intend to use the veto in this event?
Comment on this
I have already explained this to the Deputy. Perhaps he would familiarise himself with the proceedings of the Community. He might thus realise that the question he is posing is one which——
Comment on this
I am not in a position to give a yes or no answer to the Deputy's question. If the Deputy does not understand the answer, I cannot be attacked because of that.