We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil
‹ Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Youth Development Officer Scheme.

Youth development officers scheme

Summary

Members across parties asked whether the scheme would be discontinued and sought continued or expanded funding, including support for officers in Kerry and Voluntary Service International. The Minister said the scheme would be made permanent, funding per officer had risen from £5,000 to £7,000, and there would be no decrease in the current number of officers; future development of youth services would also be considered by the Costello committee.

Mr. Leonard

asked the Minister for Labour if he will provide funds to ensure the continuance of the development officers scheme to enable regional councils of youth clubs to employ full-time youth officers.

15.

Comment on this

asked the Minister for Labour if he is aware of the serious consequences for youth organisations if funding is withdrawn from the development officers scheme for the appointment of full-time youth workers; and if the Government will review their decision with a view to establishing the scheme on a permanent basis.

16.

Comment on this

asked the Minister for Labour if he will ensure the continued appointment of development officers in view of his recent commitment to youth organisations to expand and develop their role in society.

17.

Comment on this

asked the Minister for Labour if he will provide funds to retain two youth officers in County Kerry who are serving 38 youth clubs which have an average membership of 150.

18.

Comment on this

asked the Minister for Labour if, in view of the success of the youth development officers scheme over the past four years, he will now make funds available to continue and expand this scheme on a permanent basis; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

19.

Comment on this

asked the Minister for Labour whether it is his intention to suspend the development officer scheme which has been in operation for some time.

20.

Comment on this

asked the Minister for Labour if he proposes to continue the youth development officers scheme, in view of the importance of the scheme for youth organisations.

21.

Comment on this

asked the Minister for Labour if he intends to continue funding the development officer scheme attached to voluntary service international.

22.

Comment on this

asked the Minister for Labour if he will re-consider the decision to discontinue the youth development officer scheme as a matter of urgency in view of the Government's commitment to respond to the needs of young people.

Comment on this
George. M. Birmingham Minister of State at the Department of Labour (Mr. G. Birmingham) Fine Gael

I propose to take Questions Nos. 14 to 22, inclusive, together.

In keeping with the Government's firm commitments in the youth area, provision is being made for the continued employment of youth development officers on a permanent basis.

Comment on this

In view of the commitments could the Minister explain the reason why for several weeks the decision in respect of development officers was that they could not be kept in employment? Could he also inform the House if the resources which had been requested by these youth officers are being made available by the Department?

Comment on this

The whole question of the youth development officers was, as Deputy Mac Giolla reminded us, the subject of an Adjournment Debate in the House recently. At that time I stated accurately — and I resent any suggestion to the contrary from Deputy Mac Giolla — that only two decisions had been made by the Government in respect of the development officer scheme: first, to increase the level of support for it officially from the £5,000, at which it stood for four years, to a sum of £7,000; and secondly, to continue the status quo until the end of this year, thus continuing in employment 11 officers who otherwise would have lost their jobs had the original scheme been adhered to.

From the time I took office I was approached by a number of youth organisations and asked what our intentions were and at all stages it was made clear to them that no final decision could be taken until the Government came to consider the Estimates for next year. The House is aware that the Government are engaged in that process and I am happy to say that, arising from that process, this scheme, which up to now has been of a temporary and ad hoc nature, will in future be permanent.

Comment on this

Could the Minister inform us how many youth development officers will be financed under this scheme? Will there be any decrease?

Comment on this

There will be no decrease.

Comment on this

Will there be room for further improvement?

Comment on this

We need all that we have at the moment.

Comment on this

Will there be any increase?

Comment on this

This scheme was a temporary one. The concern among youth organisations was that what had previously been temporary should be put on a permanent footing and I am glad that the Government took a decision to that effect. The question of the future development of youth services is obviously an approach to be considered by the committee now sitting under the chairmanship of Mr. Justice Declan Costello.

Comment on this

The Minister refers to the concern of youth clubs. Will he agree that there is a grave concern in the community at large and among community associations at the reluctance of the Government to take a positive decision?

Comment on this
Thomas J. Fitzpatrick An Ceann Comhairle Fine Gael

That does not seem to be a question.

Comment on this

The Government took such a decision in relation to the development officer scheme since taking office, firstly, to increase the level of support from £5,000 to £7,000. The existing level of support had remained unchanged for four years and this was proving a millstone around the necks of many of those voluntary organisations who employed those officers. Secondly, as I said earlier, we took a decision to keep in employment those whose employment would otherwise be terminated. Lastly, I am glad to say that we were in the position to respond and to make what had up to now been a temporary scheme permanent.

Comment on this