Clery’s Dispute Welfare Allowances
The Minister said people participating in or financing a trade dispute were generally excluded from supplementary welfare allowance for themselves, though dependants and urgent needs could qualify. He invited details of alleged differences between health boards; the Chair limited supplementary questions to the trade-dispute circumstances.
asked the Minister for Social Welfare the reason certain categories of workers affected by the dispute in Clery's, Dublin were in receipt of supplementary welfare allowance while other categories were excluded; and if he will make a statement on the matter.
Comment on this
The legislation governing the supplementary welfare allowances scheme provides that a person involved in a trade dispute is not entitled to an allowance in respect of himself but he may receive payment in respect of his dependants. This provision does not, however, exclude payment to the claimant himself in case of urgent need. Every application is dealt with on its merits, having regard to the circumstances of the person concerned. The foregoing disqualification does not, however, apply to a person at the place of employment who is not participating in or financing or directly interested in the trade dispute which caused the stoppage of work.
The Eastern Health Board administer the supplementary welfare allowances scheme in Dublin and the board have stated that no category of persons covered by the provisions of the scheme was excluded from payment of an allowance. The board are unable to supply more specific information in the absence of details of individual cases.
Comment on this
Like the free fuel scheme, different standards apply for the payment of supplementary welfare allowances. Would the Minister have that situation examined as well so that there would not be anomalies as between one health board and another, which is the cause of hardship and dissension among deserving people?
Comment on this
What discretion had the community welfare officer in deciding who was entitled to supplementary welfare allowance?
Comment on this
I want to object to what you are doing in regard to supplementary questions. You are being most unfair to this side of the House.